Studies of Bilingual Processing Presented to Kenneth I. Forster

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Keyword(s):  
2020 ◽  
Vol 1738 ◽  
pp. 146794
Author(s):  
Jingwen Ma ◽  
Yujia Wu ◽  
Tao Sun ◽  
Lei Cai ◽  
Xiaoxuan Fan ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 703-705 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanping Dong ◽  
Ping Li
Keyword(s):  

2001 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. 169-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ellen Bialystok

This chapter examines differences in metalinguistic development between monolingual and bilingual children in terms of three subcategories: word awareness, syntactic awareness, and phonological awareness. In each case, some studies have reported advantages for bilingual children, but equally, other studies have found either no difference between the groups, or, in some cases, monolingual advantages. In the discussion of each of these areas, the kinds of tasks for which bilingual and monolingual children perform differently are identified. In none of these three subcategories of metalinguistic awareness do bilingual children exhibit a uniform and consistent advantage over monolinguals. An alternate conception of metalinguistic ability is proposed in which two cognitive processes, analysis and control, are directly responsible for task performance. These processes are involved in all metalinguistic tasks but to different degrees. Re-examining the results in this way reveals that bilingual advantages occur reliably on tasks that make high demands on control but are not evident in tasks that make high demands on analysis. The implications of this pattern for metalinguistic ability are considered.


Author(s):  
Panos Athanasopoulos ◽  
Jeanine Treffers-Daller

Author(s):  
David Birdsong ◽  
Libby M. Gertken

This study critically examines the widespread practice of comparing the linguistic processes and representations of non-native speakers with those of natives. We argue that, in some respects, the method yields benefits, while in others it does not serve the interests of research into the nature of second language acquisition and bilingualism. We go on to consider certain analytical approaches that skirt the hazards of the method. The potential payoffs of native/non-native comparisons are illustrated in a priming study of monolingual and bilingual processing of ambiguity in complex French syntax (Gertken 2013).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document