Chapter 11. Higher education language policies for mobility and inclusion

2022 ◽  
pp. 216-234
Author(s):  
Manuel Celio Conceição ◽  
Elisa Caruso
Author(s):  
Andrew Linn ◽  
Anastasiya Bezborodova ◽  
Saida Radjabzade

AbstractThis article presents a practical project to develop a language policy for an English-Medium-Instruction university in Uzbekistan. Although the university is de facto English-only, it presents a complex language ecology, which in turn has led to confusion and disagreement about language use on campus. The project team investigated the experience, views and attitudes of over a thousand people, including faculty, students, administrative and maintenance staff, in order to arrive at a proposed policy which would serve the whole community, based on the principle of tolerance and pragmatism. After outlining the relevant language and educational context and setting out the methods and approach of the underpinning research project, the article goes on to present the key findings. One of the striking findings was an appetite for control and regulation of language behaviours. Language policies in Higher Education invariably fall down at the implementation stage because of a lack of will to follow through on their principles and their specific guidelines. Language policy in international business on the other hand is characterised by a control stage invariably lacking in language planning in education. Uzbekistan is a polity used to control measures following from policy implementation. The article concludes by suggesting that Higher Education in Central Asia may stand a better chance of seeing through language policies around English-Medium Instruction than, for example, in northern Europe, based on the tension between tolerance on the one hand and control on the other.


2006 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 267-293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth J. Erling ◽  
Suzanne K. Hilgendorf

2021 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 154-179
Author(s):  
Wanyu Amy Ou ◽  
Mingyue Michelle Gu ◽  
Francis M. Hult

Abstract The advancement of English as an instrument for the internationalization of higher education has foregrounded English as an academic lingua franca (EALF), and the case of China is no exception. This study focuses on the process by which EALF has been interpreted and negotiated across university policies and local practices in China’s internationalized higher education. Drawing upon nexus analysis and multisource data, the study traced the discursive (re)location of EALF across different scales of social activity related to multilingualism at an English-medium transnational university in China. Our analysis illustrates the tension between English and other co-existing languages, as presented in educational language policies and as perceived and practiced by multilingual students in the local communicative context. The findings also show an interactive policymaking process through which students and university administrators opened ideological and implementational spaces that linguistically and semiotically pluralized communicative scenarios at the internationalized university in focus.


Author(s):  
Marko Svicevic

This article attempts to analyse a single aspect of the #FeesMustFall movement, namely, university language policies. The research problem is defined as an unjustifiable underdevelopment of indigenous African languages as mediums of instruction at institutions of higher education. The research problem is situated with defective university language policies. Firstly, most current language policies detract from a national framework on the advancement of indigenous African languages. Secondly, most current university language policies have no clear implementation plan and the advancement of their specified African indigenous language(s) remains unrealised. This underdevelopment of indigenous African languages can also be attributed to the ‘Anglicisation’ of the higher education sphere. Finally, this paper utilises and builds on the Language Policy for Higher Education and a 2005 Ministerial Committee Report on the development of indigenous African languages in universities, ultimately proposing implementable policy considerations in (re)addressing the underdevelopment of indigenous African languages as mediums of instruction across all public institutions of higher education.


2016 ◽  
Vol 73 (4) ◽  
pp. 597-612 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taina Saarinen ◽  
Peppi Taalas

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document