A Comparative Analysis of the Accelerated Cost Recovery System as Enacted by the 1981 Economic Recovery Tax Act

1982 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leland T. Blank ◽  
Donald R. Smith
2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (11) ◽  
pp. 2448-2471
Author(s):  
S.V. Anureev

Subject. This article examines the functions and management structures of central financial bodies and related parliamentary and governmental structures in Australia, Canada, Great Britain, Japan, Germany, France and Italy. Objectives. The article aims to identify non-standard functions and structures that go beyond the classical responsibility of finance ministries as a central part of the budget process arising from current economic challenges. Methods. For the study, I used a comparative analysis. Results. The article describes the important new functions of financial authorities and treasuries of Western governments aimed at economic growth and economic recovery. Conclusions. The organizational and management structures and functions of the ministries of finance go far beyond the budget process, overlap with and dominate the functions of central banks and ministries of economic development.


1993 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 115-136
Author(s):  
Elli Kraizberg

The 1986 Tax Reform Act is likely to extend optimal holding periods of depreciable assets until the point in time at which the tax basis is exhausted. Additionally, practitioners in the real estate markets tend to argue that the 1986 Tax Reform calls for a major reduction in depreciation tax benefits. Despite the reduction in benefits, values of depreciable properties may nevertheless rise. This paper analyzes various tax legislations in terms of the effect these legislations have on the optimal trading policy for depreciable assets. The tax code of the 1981 accelerated cost recovery system (ACRS), the 1984 ACRS, and the new 1986 Tax Reform Act are compared.


1989 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 91-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
RAYMOND E. LUND

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document