A Prose Learning Strategy Training Program Based on Network and Depth-of-Processing Models

1982 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 180-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
George M. Diekhoff ◽  
Pamela J. Brown ◽  
Donald F. Dansereau
Author(s):  
Donald F. Dansereau ◽  
Gary L. Long ◽  
Barbara A. McDonald ◽  
Tomme R. Actkinson ◽  
Alice M. Ellis ◽  
...  

1975 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald F. Dansereau ◽  
Gary L. Long ◽  
Barbara A. McDonald ◽  
Tomme R. Actkinson ◽  
Karen W. Collins ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 215 (3) ◽  
pp. 174-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Detlev Leutner ◽  
Claudia Leopold ◽  
Viola den Elzen-Rump

Abstract. Forty-five university students participated in a computer-based training program on self-regulated learning from expository text. The training program introduced students to a learning strategy helping them identify and highlight important text information. Students were randomly assigned to three treatment groups: (1) no training at all, (2) training in highlighting only, or (3) combined training in both highlighting and self-regulation. After completing the training, students were instructed to read an instructional text and apply the trained strategies. The extent to which they applied the strategies while reading the text was assessed, and the amount of knowledge and comprehension they had acquired and recalled from the text was measured. Results show that students in the combined training condition outperformed their counterparts in the learning strategy training condition, who in turn outperformed those with no training at all. The results are in line with recent self-regulated learning theories, which state that, in addition to teaching students specific cognitive learning strategies, it is worth training them to monitor and regulate their strategy use.


Author(s):  
Donald F. Dansereau ◽  
Gary L. Long ◽  
Barbara A. McDonald ◽  
Tomme R. Actkinson ◽  
Karen W. Collins ◽  
...  

1978 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald F. Dansereau ◽  
John C. Garland ◽  
Karen W. Collins ◽  
Charles S. Holley ◽  
Barbara A. McDonald

Author(s):  
Colin Madland ◽  
Griff Richards

<p>The study buddy is a learning strategy employed in a graduate distance course to promote informal peer reviewing of assignments before submission. This strategy promotes student-student interaction and helps break the social isolation of distance learning. Given the concern by Arum and Roksa (2011) that student-student interaction may be distracting from instead of contributing to academic achievement it was felt important to examine the way peer interaction can contribute to learning in a well-structured collaborative learning activity. This mixed-methods study (n=31) examined both quantitative and qualitative aspects of student perceptions of the study buddy activity. While quantitative findings regarding depth of processing were inconclusive due to the small and homogeneous sample, qualitative analysis showed very high levels of learner support for the activity as well as evidence that the activity encouraged learners to approach their learning with greater depth. 88% of study buddies said they found the activity well worth their time, and would recommend it for other graduate courses. It is thought with greater scaffolding, the quality of buddy feedback might be improved. The few who did not appreciate the activity felt let down by a lack of buddy commitment to the process.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document