W-band ELDOR-detected NMR (EDNMR) spectroscopy as a versatile technique for the characterisation of transition metal–ligand interactions

2013 ◽  
Vol 111 (18-19) ◽  
pp. 2788-2808 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas Cox ◽  
Wolfgang Lubitz ◽  
Anton Savitsky
1995 ◽  
Vol 48 (9) ◽  
pp. 1625 ◽  
Author(s):  
AJ Downard ◽  
PJ Steel ◽  
J Steenwijk

Eleven chelating tetrazole -containing ligands have been synthesized, and their complexes with palladium(II) and ruthenium(II) prepared. Proton n.m.r. spectroscopy, electronic absorption spectroscopy and cyclic voltammetry have been used to study the nature of the metal-ligand interactions in these complexes. The negatively charged tetrazolate group is shown to be a strong electron donor with very different properties to those of the protonated or alkylated tetrazole group. This leads to pH control of the properties of transition metal complexes containing such ligands.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anders Brakestad ◽  
Peter Wind ◽  
Stig Rune Jensen ◽  
Luca Frediani ◽  
Kathrin Hopmann

The following article will be submitted to the Journal of Chemical Physics. It is thus not a peer-reviewed manuscript. After it is hopefully accepted for publication, it will be found (in revised form) at https://aip.scitation.org/journal/jcp<div><br></div><div>Transition metal-catalyzed reactions invariably include steps, where ligands associate or dissociate. In order to obtain reliable energies for such reactions, sufficiently large basis sets need to be employed. In this paper, we have used high-precision Multiwavelet calculations to compute the metal-ligand association energies for 27 transition metal complexes with common ligands such as H2, CO, olefins and solvent molecules. By comparing our Multiwavelet results to a variety of frequently used Gaussian-type basis sets, we show that counterpoise corrections, which are widely employed to correct for basis set superposition errors, often lead to underbinding. Additionally, counterpoise corrections are difficult to employ, when the association step also involves a chemical transformation. Multiwavelets, which can be conveniently applied to all types of reactions, provide a promising alternative for computing electronic interaction energies free from any basis set errors. <br></div>


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anders Brakestad ◽  
Peter Wind ◽  
Stig Rune Jensen ◽  
Luca Frediani ◽  
Kathrin Hopmann

The following article will be submitted to the Journal of Chemical Physics. It is thus not a peer-reviewed manuscript. After it is hopefully accepted for publication, it will be found (in revised form) at https://aip.scitation.org/journal/jcp<div><br></div><div>Transition metal-catalyzed reactions invariably include steps, where ligands associate or dissociate. In order to obtain reliable energies for such reactions, sufficiently large basis sets need to be employed. In this paper, we have used high-precision Multiwavelet calculations to compute the metal-ligand association energies for 27 transition metal complexes with common ligands such as H2, CO, olefins and solvent molecules. By comparing our Multiwavelet results to a variety of frequently used Gaussian-type basis sets, we show that counterpoise corrections, which are widely employed to correct for basis set superposition errors, often lead to underbinding. Additionally, counterpoise corrections are difficult to employ, when the association step also involves a chemical transformation. Multiwavelets, which can be conveniently applied to all types of reactions, provide a promising alternative for computing electronic interaction energies free from any basis set errors. <br></div>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document