Hand hygiene practices in adult versus pediatric intensive care units at a university hospital before and after intervention

2007 ◽  
Vol 39 (6-7) ◽  
pp. 566-570 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rezhan Hussein ◽  
Rashida Khakoo ◽  
Gerald Hobbs
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Santiago Mencia ◽  
Raquel Cieza ◽  
Jimena Del Castillo ◽  
Jesús López-Herce ◽  
Sedation Group of Spanish Pediatric Critical Care SEDUCIP

Abstract Background Analgosedation (AS) assessment using clinical scales is crucial to follow the international recommendations about analgosedation. The Analgosedation workgroup of the Spanish Society of Pediatric Intensive Care (SECIP) carried out two surveys in 2008 and 2015, which verified the gap in analgosedation assessment in Spanish PICUs. The objective of the study was to analyze how analgosedation assessment by clinical scales changed after a multicenter intervention program. Methods multicenter pre-post study comparing the use of sedation, analgesia, withdrawal and delirium scales before and after the MONISEDA project. Results were also compared with a control group formed by non-participating units. A survey about analgosedation management and monitoring was filled out before (year 2015) and after (year 2020) the implementation of the Moniseda project in 2016. Results were compared between those periods of time, but also between participant and non-participants PICUs in the Moniseda project (M-group and non-M group, respectively). Data related to analgosedation of all patients admitted to a Moniseda-participant PICU were also collected for 2 months. Results 15 Spanish PICUs were enrolled in the Moniseda project and other 15 non-participant PICUs formed the control group. In the M-group, the number of PICUs with a written analgosedation protocol increased from 53 to 100% (p = 0.003) and withdrawal protocol from 53 to 100% (p = 0.003), whereas in non-M group the written AS protocol increased from 80 to 87% and withdrawal protocol stayed on 80%.


2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ayşe Karaaslan ◽  
Eda Kepenekli Kadayifci ◽  
Serkan Atıcı ◽  
Uluhan Sili ◽  
Ahmet Soysal ◽  
...  

Background.The objective of this study was to assess the compliance of hand hygiene (HH) of healthcare workers (HCWs) in the neonatal and pediatric intensive care unit in a tertiary university hospital in Istanbul.Methods.An observational study was conducted on the compliance of HH for the five World Health Organization (WHO) indications. HCWs were observed during routine patient care in day shift. The authors also measured the technique of HH through hand washing or hand hygiene with alcohol-based disinfectant.Results.A total of 704 HH opportunities were identified during the observation period. Overall compliance was 37.0% (261/704). Compliance differed by role: nurses (41.4%) and doctors (31.9%) [P=0.02, OR: 1.504, CI 95%: 1.058–2.137]. HCWs were more likely to use soap and water (63.6%) compared to waterless-alcohol-based hand hygiene (36.3%) [P<0.05].Conclusion.Adherence to hand hygiene practice and use of alcohol-based disinfectant was found to be very low. Effective education programs that improve adherence to hand hygiene and use of disinfectants may be helpful to increase compliance.


2009 ◽  
Vol 4 (02) ◽  
pp. 118-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Supaletchimi Gopal Katherason ◽  
Lin Naing ◽  
Kamarudin Jaalam ◽  
Nik Abdullah Nik Mohamad ◽  
Kavita Bhojwani ◽  
...  

Background: Hand decontamination is a critical infection control practice in the prevention of nosocomial infection. This study was conducted to observe the hand hygiene practices of nurses and doctors in two intensive care units (ICUs) in Malaysia. Methodology: Staff members were observed during patient contacts, and their hand washing techniques and hand hygiene practices were monitored. Five contact periods were observed for staff members while they cared for their assigned patients. Hand hygiene practices before and after patient contacts were categorized as clean uncontaminated, clean recontaminated, new gloves, and unchanged contaminated gloves. Compliance to hand-washing steps and time taken for hand washing were analyzed. Appropriate use of gloves based on CDC criteria also was assessed. Results: Compliance to hand hygiene practices was 70% before each patient contact. Staff members did not completely adhere to the hand-washing steps. The average time taken to wash hands was 20 seconds, and the necessary steps (rubbing palm over dorsum; rubbing fingers interlaced, and rotational rubbing of thumbs) were practiced minimally by all staff. Hand washing protocol was generally followed by all staff (100%). Alcohol hand rubs were available but were used moderately (60%); when used, staff members did not wait for the alcohol to dry. Only 4% of staff changed contaminated gloves between patients. Conclusions: Hand hygiene compliance by ICU staff members needs to be improved. Improving adherence to correct hand hygiene techniques will require effective education programs and behavioral modification techniques. Moreover, hand hygiene guidelines must be incorporated into new staff orientation programs and the continuing education curriculum in the two hospitals studied.


2009 ◽  
Vol 35 (11) ◽  
pp. 1843-1849 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan N. M. Schieveld ◽  
Judith A. van der Valk ◽  
Inge Smeets ◽  
Eline Berghmans ◽  
Renske Wassenberg ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document