scholarly journals Innovation outcomes and processes in infrastructure projects – a co mparative study of Design-Build and Design-Build-Maintenance contracts

Author(s):  
Johan Larsson ◽  
Per Erik Eriksson ◽  
Sofia Lingegård ◽  
Anna-Therése Järvenpää
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (21) ◽  
pp. 11983
Author(s):  
Sofia Lingegård ◽  
Malena I. Havenvid ◽  
Per-Erik Eriksson

Public clients’ procurement strategies are central in facilitating innovation towards sustainability. In the infrastructure sector, the three main project activities—design, production, and maintenance—are traditionally not procured in an integrated way, which results in sub-optimizations and a lack of life cycle perspective. As project actors are accustomed to traditional, non-integrated forms of contract, implementing integrated contracts imposes fundamental changes to the interdependencies among actors, resources, and activities. This study analyzes the interfaces among key project actors and the related interdependencies across design, production, and maintenance in Design–Build–Maintain contracts, and initiates a discussion on how to manage these interdependencies when implementing integrated contracts. This study of circular public procurement (CPP) focused on three infrastructure projects using integrated contracting and applied the industrial network approach (INA) to analyze interdependencies in how they may influence innovation and sustainable development. The study found significant obstacles to clients obtaining the benefits of integrated contracting and concludes that understanding interdependencies is necessary to implement integrated contracts successfully. The study contributes to the construction management literature by adapting the INA to contracting, and to the CPP literature by providing empirical evidence of sustainability and circularity in infrastructure projects.


2022 ◽  

This user’s guide covers the Standard Bidding Document for the Procurement of Design–Build–Operate Contracts for Water and Wastewater Greenfield Infrastructure Projects using a single-stage: two-envelope or a two-stage bidding procedure.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 04020068 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Feghaly ◽  
Mounir El Asmar ◽  
Samuel Ariaratnam ◽  
Wylie Bearup
Keyword(s):  

Ports 2010 ◽  
2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph R. Galloway ◽  
Matt Butler
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Myrna FLORES ◽  
Matic GOLOB ◽  
Doroteja MAKLIN ◽  
Christopher TUCCI

In recent years, the way organizations innovate and develop new solutions has changed considerably. Moving from ‘behind the closed doors’ style of innovating to open innovation where collaboration with outsiders is encouraged, organizations are in the pursuit of more effective ways to accelerate their innovation outcomes. As a result, organizations are establishing creative and entrepreneurial ecosystems, which not only empower employees but also involve many others to co-create new solutions. In this paper, we present a methodology for organizing hackathons, i.e. competition-based events where small teams work over a short period of time to ideate, design, prototype and test their ideas following a user-centric approach to solve a specific challenge. This paper also provides insights into two different hackathons organized in the United Kingdom, and Mexico, as well as a series of 5 hackathons organized in Argentina, Mexico, Switzerland, United Kingdom and in Senegal.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document