Improving Preservice Teacher Preparation through the Teacher Work Sample: Exploring Assessment and Analysis of Student Learning

2010 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Ruth Stobaugh ◽  
Janet Lynne Tassell ◽  
Antony D. Norman
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 50
Author(s):  
Carl Dunst ◽  
Deborah Hamby ◽  
Robin Howse ◽  
Helen Wilkie ◽  
Kimberly Annas

Results from a metasynthesis of the relationships between 14 different types of preservice teacher preparation practices and teaching quality, preschool to university student performance, and university student and beginning teacher belief appraisals are reported. Each type of preservice practice (e.g., course-based student learning) included different kinds of instructional methods (e.g., problem-based learning, inquiry-based learning, and project-based learning). The metasynthesis included 118 meta-analyses and 12 surveys of more than three million study participants. Findings clearly indicated that active university student and beginning teacher involvement in mastering the use of instructional practices and both knowledge and skill acquisition by far stood out as the most important preservice teacher preparation practices. These included extended student teaching experiences, simulated instructional practices and microteaching, faculty coaching and mentoring, clinical supervision, different types of cooperative learning practices, and course-based active student learning methods. The pattern of results helped identify high leverage and high impact teacher preparation practices. Implications for future research and improving teacher preparation are described.


1984 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 74-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonore Ganschow ◽  
Donald B. Weber ◽  
Melonee Davis

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-20
Author(s):  
Ester J. De Jong

English as an Additional Language (EAL) students are increasingly taught by non-specialist, mainstream teachers. This trend calls for a reconceptualization of teacher education to explicitly and purposefully include linguistically and culturally responsive pedagogy in their curriculum. In the United States, several frameworks have been proposed to address this need, although much still needs to be learned about actual practice in preservice teacher preparation programs. In this article, I caution against the monolingual bias in preservice teacher preparation and argue for the mandate for developing a multilingual stance for all teachers of EAL students.


2017 ◽  
pp. 643-664
Author(s):  
Emmanuel Adjei-Boateng

This chapter examines primary issues confronting preservice teacher preparation in the US public schools. There are several issues confronting teaching and teacher education programs. However, this chapter explores cultural and linguistic diversity issues given the critical need for inclusive education. The increasing nature of demographic changes in the schools and the U.S. society also has ramifications for students' learning and preservice teacher preparation. To that end, this chapter examines efforts by organizations and educational researchers to respond to the phenomenon of demographic changes in US public schools and the need to equip teachers with competencies needed to help students become successful in schools. The author examines how one teacher education program is preparing teachers to meet the demands of teaching culturally and linguistically diverse student population. Finally, the author provides suggestions on how to improve and enhance culturally responsive pedagogical competence among preservice teachers.


2022 ◽  
pp. 335-356
Author(s):  
André P. Botha ◽  
Leila Goosen

This chapter presents a reconceptualization of preservice teacher preparation in the context of science, information technology, and African language education using action research (AR). The authors provide a background of AR as a transformative practice, along with benefits and possible limitations, and describe how student teachers turn theory to practice as change agents engaging in reflection and implementing solutions. Collaborative interaction between mentor teachers and lecturers and the project reports and reflective journals generated by the student teachers are integral parts of the research design and internship program. The authors recommend the use of AR to empower student teachers to deal effectively with probems that arise, and they discuss future research directions.


2005 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 188-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
John E. Henning ◽  
Andrea DeBruin‐Parecki ◽  
Becky Wilson Hawbaker ◽  
Curtis P. Nielsen ◽  
Elana Joram ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document