Unit training to increase support for military personnel with mental health problems

Work & Stress ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 281-296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas W. Britt ◽  
Kristen J. Black ◽  
Janelle H. Cheung ◽  
Cynthia L. S. Pury ◽  
Heidi M. Zinzow
2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 243-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carol Chu ◽  
Ian H. Stanley ◽  
Melanie A. Hom ◽  
Ingrid C. Lim ◽  
Thomas E. Joiner

2015 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 144-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.-L. Sharp ◽  
N. T. Fear ◽  
R. J. Rona ◽  
S. Wessely ◽  
N. Greenberg ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 285-295
Author(s):  
Christian D. G. Stoltenberg ◽  
Lars R. Nissen ◽  
Anni B. S. Nielsen ◽  
Mia S. Vedtofte ◽  
Jacob L. Marott ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 42 (8) ◽  
pp. 1663-1673 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. MacManus ◽  
K. Dean ◽  
M. Al Bakir ◽  
A. C. Iversen ◽  
L. Hull ◽  
...  

BackgroundThere is growing concern about an alleged rise in violent behaviour amongst military personnel returning from deployment to Iraq and Afghanistan. The aims of this study were to determine the prevalence of violence in a sample of UK military personnel following homecoming from deployment in Iraq and to examine the impact of deployment-related experiences, such as combat trauma, on violence, and the role of sociodemographics and pre-enlistment antisocial behaviour.MethodThis study used baseline data from a cohort study of a large randomly selected sample of UK Armed Forces personnel in service at the time of the Iraq war (2003). Regular personnel (n=4928) who had been deployed to Iraq were included. Data, collected by questionnaire, included information on deployment experiences, sociodemographic and military characteristics, pre-enlistment antisocial behaviour, post-deployment health outcomes and a self-report measure of physical violence in the weeks following return from deployment.ResultsPrevalence of violence was 12.6%. This was strongly associated with pre-enlistment antisocial behaviour [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 3.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.9–4.4]. After controlling for pre-enlistment antisocial behaviour, sociodemographics and military factors, violence was still strongly associated with holding a combat role (aOR 2.0, 95% CI 1.6–2.5) and having experienced multiple traumatic events on deployment (aOR for four or more traumatic events 3.7, 95% CI 2.5–5.5). Violence on homecoming was also associated with mental health problems such as post-traumatic stress disorder (aOR 4.8, 95% CI 3.2–7.2) and alcohol misuse (aOR 3.1, 95% CI 2.5–3.9).ConclusionsExperiences of combat and trauma during deployment were significantly associated with violent behaviour following homecoming in UK military personnel. Post-deployment mental health problems and alcohol misuse are also associated with increased violence.


2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (13) ◽  
pp. 2202-2212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jamie Kwan ◽  
Margaret Jones ◽  
Greta Somaini ◽  
Lisa Hull ◽  
Simon Wessely ◽  
...  

AbstractBackgroundResearch into violence among military personnel has not differentiated between stranger- and family-directed violence. While military factors (combat exposure and post-deployment mental health problems) are risk factors for general violence, there has been limited research on their impact on violence within the family environment. This study aims to compare the prevalence of family-directed and stranger-directed violence among a deployed sample of UK military personnel and to explore risk factors associated with both family- and stranger-directed violence.MethodThis study utilised data from a large cohort study which collected information by questionnaire from a representative sample of randomly selected deployed UK military personnel (n = 6711).ResultsThe prevalence of family violence immediately following return from deployment was 3.6% and 7.8% for stranger violence. Family violence was significantly associated with having left service, while stranger violence was associated with younger age, male gender, being single, having a history of antisocial behaviour as well as having left service. Deployment in a combat role was significantly associated with both family and stranger violence after adjustment for confounders [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.92 (1.25–2.94), p = 0.003 and aOR = 1.77 (1.31–2.40), p < 0.001, respectively], as was the presence of symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder, common mental disorders and aggression.ConclusionsExposure to combat and post-deployment mental health problems are risk factors for violence both inside and outside the family environment and should be considered in violence reduction programmes for military personnel. Further research using a validated measurement tool for family violence would improve comparability with other research.


2000 ◽  
Vol 42 (01) ◽  
pp. 14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen R Zubrick ◽  
Jennifer J Kurinczuk ◽  
Brett M C McDermott ◽  
Robert S McKelvey ◽  
Sven R Silburn ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document