High geochemical background of potentially harmful elements in soils and sediments: implications for the remediation of contaminated sites

2011 ◽  
Vol 27 (sup1) ◽  
pp. 131-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giovanna Armiento ◽  
Carlo Cremisini ◽  
Elisa Nardi ◽  
Renata Pacifico
2019 ◽  
Vol 60 (5) ◽  
pp. 1055-1068
Author(s):  
Mansour Hussain Manea ◽  
Balsam Salim. Al-Tawash ◽  
Younus I. Al-Saady

Heavy metals concentration in the soils and sediments has increased worldwide during the last century as a result of the rapid increase in population which combined by an increase in human activity as agriculture,  industrial and many other activities. Ten soil and three river sediment samples were collected from 10 main sampling stations at Shatt Al-Hilla River from Sada area to Dora Bridge in Babylon province. The chemical analysis of the sedimentation sample in the laboratory included pH calculation, electrical conductivity (EC) (Cation Exchange Capacity (CEC), organic matter (OM), and heavy metals as (Mn, Ni, Cr, Zn, Cu, Co, Pb, Cd, As and Fe). Indirect geochemical background (IGB) of heavy metal was calculated by the iterative 2 standard deviations (SD) method. The results of enrichment factor for heavy metals of the soil and sediment show that the all heavy metals in the studied samples were within Ef<2 indicate to depletion to minimal enrichment (i.e. no or minimal pollution). While Cd in the sample (5), Co in the sample (7), Cr in the sample (8) and Mn in the sample (1S) are within 2 ≤ EF < 5 indicate to Moderate enrichment. Contamination factor (Cf) for heavy metals of soil and sediment show that the all heavy metals in the studied samples were within Cf < 1 -Low contamination. While Sample "2" (Cd, Fe), sample "3" (Ni, Cr, Pb, and Cd), sample "4" (Mn, Fe) and sample "8" (Cr) are within 1 ≤ Cf < 3 moderate contamination. Pollution load index result of all the soil and sediment samples are less than one indicate that  "no pollution" are present, except sample 3 where the PLI value higher than 1 indicates the samples have been "polluted ". The modified degree of contamination (mCd) data indicate nil to a low degree of contamination for all of the soil and sediments samples.


2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 241-254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nien-Hsin Kao ◽  
Ming-Chien Su ◽  
Chih-Chun Yen ◽  
Yu-Jen Huang

1995 ◽  
Vol 29 (7) ◽  
pp. 1845-1850 ◽  
Author(s):  
Holger. Hintelmann ◽  
Maximilian. Hempel ◽  
Rolf Dieter. Wilken

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 1391-1411
Author(s):  
Rimantė Zinkutė ◽  
Ričardas Taraškevičius ◽  
Margarita Jankauskaitė ◽  
Vaidotas Kazakauskas ◽  
Žilvinas Stankevičius

AbstractThis study of peri-urban minerogenic topsoil on glacigenic or post-glacial deposits shows the influence of the site-classification approach on the differentiated median background (DMB) values of major elements and the potentially harmful elements (PHEs) Ba, Cr, Cu, Mn, Ni, Pb and Zn. Composite samples from forests and meadows were taken in 25 sites, each of which had five sub-sites. A fraction of <2 mm was used to determine the organic matter by loss on ignition (LOI), grain size by laser diffraction and the elemental contents by X-ray fluorescence. The following five site-classification approaches are compared: geochemical (G), using relative median contents of Al, K, Ti; textural (T), according to mean percentages of clay-sized fraction (CLF) and silt fraction (SIF); lithological (L), based on soil parent material texture from the soil database; soil type (S), presented in the soil database; and parent material (P), generalising the underlying Quaternary deposits. Sites were classified into four level groups in which the DMB values were estimated after eliminating anomalies. The average ranks of three scores according to SIF, CLF, LOI, Al, K, Ti, Fe, Mg, Ca and S in the respective groups revealed the highest value for the G approach. It better eliminates the CLF and SIF influences on the median assessment indices of PHEs in sites.


2006 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 340-344
Author(s):  
A. Seech ◽  
D. Raymond ◽  
J. Moreno
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document