Veterans Health Administration: A Model for Transforming Nursing Home Care

2012 ◽  
Vol 26 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 183-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonne Lemke
Stroke ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 46 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Greg Arling ◽  
Susan Ofner ◽  
Laura Meyers ◽  
Joanne Daggy ◽  
Mat Reeves ◽  
...  

Background: Patients vary greatly in their use of care after hospitalization for stroke. We classified stroke patients according to their care trajectories and associated costs in the 12-month period after hospital discharge. Methods: We followed a cohort of 3,811 veterans for one year after hospitalization with ischemic stroke in Veterans Health Administration facilities in 2007. Three discharge outcomes -- nursing home care, home care, and mortality -- were modeled jointly with Latent Class Growth Analysis. VA and Medicare costs were obtained for use of institutional care (inpatient acute, rehabilitation facility, and nursing home) and home care (home health, other home care, and outpatient rehabilitation). Covariates included patient age, NIHSS stroke severity and FIM scores measured at hospital discharge. Results: Members of the cohort had one of five care trajectories: 49% had a Rapid Recovery with little or no use of care in the 12 months after discharge, 15% had a Gradual Recovery with initially high nursing or home care use that tapered off over time, 9% had consistent use of Long-Term Home Care (HC), 13% had consistent use of Long-Term Nursing Home Care (NH), and 14% had an Unstable trajectory with multiple transitions between long-term and acute care. Patients with Long-Term NH and Unstable trajectories had the highest average total costs (greater than $60,000 per person) and patients with the Rapid Recovery trajectory had the lowest cost (less than $11,000 per person). Medicare accounted for 23% of total costs. In a multinomial regression model, the likelihood of a Long-Term NH, Long-Term HC or an Unstable Trajectory was greatest for persons with more severe strokes (higher NIHSS score), more disability (lower FIM score), and age 65 or older. About half of the veterans received rehabilitation services. Most rehabilitation was delivered in the NH. There was no clear association between use of rehabilitation and subsequent care trajectory. Conclusions: Care trajectories were explained partly by veteran health and functional status. However, we need a better understanding of system factors shaping care trajectories, particularly access to and use of rehabilitation services.


2017 ◽  
Vol 40 (7) ◽  
pp. 687-711
Author(s):  
Edward Alan Miller ◽  
Stefanie Gidmark ◽  
Emily Gadbois ◽  
James L. Rudolph ◽  
Orna Intrator

Veterans enrolled within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) may receive nursing home (NH) care in VHA-operated Community Living Centers (CLCs), State Veterans Homes (SVHs), or community NHs, which may or may not be under contract with the VHA. This study examined VHA staff perceptions of how Veterans’ eligibility for VA and other payment impacts NH referrals within VA Medical Centers (VAMCs). Thirty-five semistructured interviews were performed with discharge planning and contracting staff from 12 VAMCs from around the country. VA staff highlights the preeminent role that VA priority status played in determining placement in VA-paid NH care. VHA staff reported that Veterans’ placement in a CLC, community NH, or SVH was contingent, in part, on potential payment source (VA, Medicare, Medicaid, and other) and anticipated length of stay. They also reported that variation in Veteran referral to VA-paid NH care across VAMCs derived, in part, from differences in local and regional policies and markets. Implications for NH referral within the VHA are drawn.


2017 ◽  
Vol 58 (4) ◽  
pp. e226-e238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward Alan Miller ◽  
Stefanie Gidmark ◽  
Emily Gadbois ◽  
James L Rudolph ◽  
Orna Intrator

Author(s):  
Josephine C. Jacobs ◽  
Todd H. Wagner ◽  
Ranak Trivedi ◽  
Karl Lorenz ◽  
Courtney H. Van Houtven

Crisis ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 376-383 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brooke A. Levandowski ◽  
Constance M. Cass ◽  
Stephanie N. Miller ◽  
Janet E. Kemp ◽  
Kenneth R. Conner

Abstract. Background: The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) health-care system utilizes a multilevel suicide prevention intervention that features the use of standardized safety plans with veterans considered to be at high risk for suicide. Aims: Little is known about clinician perceptions on the value of safety planning with veterans at high risk for suicide. Method: Audio-recorded interviews with 29 VHA behavioral health treatment providers in a southeastern city were transcribed and analyzed using qualitative methodology. Results: Clinical providers consider safety planning feasible, acceptable, and valuable to veterans at high risk for suicide owing to the collaborative and interactive nature of the intervention. Providers identified the types of veterans who easily engaged in safety planning and those who may experience more difficulty with the process. Conclusion: Additional research with VHA providers in other locations and with veteran consumers is needed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document