Outcomes of Physicians with Substance Use Disorders in State Physician Health Programs: A Narrative Review

2020 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 195-202
Author(s):  
Matthew Goldenberg ◽  
Karen Miotto ◽  
Gregory E. Skipper ◽  
Jesse Sanford
2014 ◽  
Vol 65 (12) ◽  
pp. 1492-1495 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter M. Yellowlees ◽  
Michael D. Campbell ◽  
John S. Rose ◽  
Michelle Burke Parish ◽  
Daphne Ferrer ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 327-334 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Brooks ◽  
Sarah R. Early ◽  
Doris C. Gundersen ◽  
Jay H. Shore ◽  
Michael H. Gendel

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dexter L. Louie ◽  
Mehret T. Assefa ◽  
Mark P. McGovern

Abstract Background The opioid epidemic is a major public health issue associated with significant overdose deaths. Effective treatments exist, such as the medication buprenorphine, but are not widely available. This narrative review examines the attitudes of primary care providers (PCPs) toward prescribing buprenorphine. Methods Narrative review of 20 articles published after the year 2000, using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to organize the findings. Results Three of the five CFIR domains (“Intervention Characteristics,” “Outer Setting,” “Inner Setting”) were strongly represented in our analysis. Providers were concerned about the clientele associated with buprenorphine, diversion, and their self-efficacy in prescribing the medication. Some believed that buprenorphine does not belong in the discipline of primary care. Other barriers included philosophical objections and stigma toward substance use disorders. Notably, two studies reported a shift in attitudes once physicians prescribed buprenorphine to actual patients. Conclusions Negative attitudes toward buprenorphine encompassed multi-layered concerns, ranging from skepticism about the medication itself, the behaviors of patients with opioid use disorders, and beliefs regarding substance use disorders more generally. We speculate, however, that negative attitudes may be improved by tailoring support strategies that address providers’ self-efficacy and level of knowledge.


Author(s):  
Gia Merlo

Patient safety is jeopardized when healthcare services are provided by physicians who suffer from substance use disorders (SUDs). When focusing on the problem of substance abuse and dependence among physicians, certain factors inherent in the medical field, such as long hours, the high-stress nature of the work, and the ease of access to drugs, make physicians more susceptible to abusing or becoming dependent on prescription drugs and alcohol. SUDs may differ in severity. The fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 2013) provides three severity specifiers: mild, moderate, and severe. Severe SUDs are also known as addictive disorders. To make matters worse, a culture of silence exists among colleagues, who often seek to protect the compromised physician from the legal consequences of abusing drugs. Luckily, the compromised physician can be provided with an intense and individualized treatment regime through physician health programs that aim for rehabilitation over termination of employment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document