scholarly journals Practice variation on hospital level in the systemic treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in The Netherlands: a population-based study

2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (4) ◽  
pp. 395-403
Author(s):  
Lotte Keikes ◽  
Miriam Koopman ◽  
Martijn M. Stuiver ◽  
Valery E. P. P. Lemmens ◽  
Martijn G. H. van Oijen ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6612-6612
Author(s):  
Lotte Keikes ◽  
Miriam Koopman ◽  
Martijn M. Stuiver ◽  
Valery Lemmens ◽  
Martijn G.H. van Oijen ◽  
...  

6612 Background: Population-based data on the implementation of guidelines for cancer patients in daily practice are scarce. Therefore, we evaluated practice variation patterns and associated variables in the systemic treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) between 2008 and 2015 in the Netherlands. Methods: We selected a random sample of adult mCRC patients diagnosed from 2008 to 2015 from the National Cancer Registry in 20 Dutch hospitals. We examined the influence of patient, demographic and tumor characteristics on the odds of being treated with systemic therapy according to the current guideline and assessed its association with survival. Results: Our study population consisted of 2222 mCRC patients of whom 1307 patients received systemic therapy for mCRC. Practice variation was most obvious in the use of bevacizumab and anti-EGFR therapy in patients with (K)RAS wild-type tumors. Administration rates did not differ between hospital types but fluctuated between individual hospitals for bevacizumab (8-92%; p<0·0001) and anti-EGFR therapy (10-75%; p=0·05). Bevacizumab administration was inversely correlated to higher age (OR:0·2; 95% CI: 0·1-0·3) comorbidity (OR:0·6; 95% CI: 0·5-0·8) and the presence of metachronous metastases (OR:0·5; 95% CI: 0·3-0·7), but patient characteristics did not differ between hospitals with low or high bevacizumab administration rates. Exposure to bevacizumab (HR:0·8; 95% CI: 0·7-0·9) and anti-EGFR therapy (HR:0·6; 95% CI: 0·5-0·8) was associated with prolonged survival. Conclusions: We identified significant inter-hospital variation in targeted therapy administration for mCRC patients, which may affect outcome. Age and comorbidity were inversely correlated with non-administration of bevacizumab, but did not explain inter-hospital practice variation. Our data strongly indicate that practice variation is based on individual strategy of hospitals rather than guideline recommendations or patient-driven decisions. Individual hospital strategies are an additional factor that may explain the observed differences between real-life data and results obtained from clinical trials.


Author(s):  
Anne-Marie Bouvier ◽  
Valérie Jooste ◽  
Maria José Sanchez-Perez ◽  
Maria José Bento ◽  
Jessica Rocha Rodrigues ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 142 (6) ◽  
pp. 1353-1360 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Haj Mohammad ◽  
N. Bernards ◽  
M. G. H. Besselink ◽  
O. R. Busch ◽  
J. W. Wilmink ◽  
...  

HPB ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. S742
Author(s):  
Y. Meyer ◽  
P. Olthof ◽  
D. Grünhagen ◽  
C. Verhoef ◽  
I. de Hingh ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4077-4077 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. J. Lim ◽  
C. Fitzgerald ◽  
S. Gill ◽  
B. Melosky ◽  
C. Speers ◽  
...  

4077 Background: Over the past 10 years, chemotherapeutic options for MCRC has significantly expanded from 5-FU based therapy, to include irinotecan and oxaliplatin. The effect of the availability of these treatments on overall survival is evaluated among patients in 3 time cohorts referred to the British Columbia Cancer Agency (BCCA). Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed or relapsed metastatic colorectal cancer referred to the BCCA in 1995/96, 2000 and 2003/04 were included. In 1995/96, 5-FU was the only palliative chemotherapy agent available at BCCA and irinotecan and oxaliplatin were available in 2000 and 2003, respectively. A one year period was used for the irinotecan cohort to minimize overlap between groups. Overall survival estimates were generated using the Kaplan Meier method. Survival was calculated from time of diagnosis of distant metastatic disease to either death or last contact date. Results: Cohorts were generally similar, however, a significantly higher proportion of patients received chemotherapy in more recent eras ( Table 1 ). Only 25% of patients received both irinotecan and oxaliplatin in 2003/4 and only 10 % received biologic therapies. An improvement in median survival of 3.6 months was observed. The improvement in the treated subgroup was 4.2 months. Outcomes of patients untreated with chemotherapy were unchanged between cohorts. Conclusions: In this population based study, the proportion of patients with MCRC treated with chemotherapy significantly increased between 1995/6 and 2000/2003/4. Patients treated with chemotherapy experienced a 4.2 month increase in median survival in 2003/4 compared to 1995/6. Survival improvements were only significant in the time period when all three effective chemotherapies (5FU, irinotecan and oxaliplatin) were available. As bevacizumab was not available until 2006, its survival impact in this population is not yet known. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document