scholarly journals Presence of anti-citrullinated protein antibodies and costs and disease activity in early rheumatoid arthritis - a 3-year follow-up

2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (5) ◽  
pp. 379-388
Author(s):  
M Husberg ◽  
L Bernfort ◽  
E Hallert
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Early Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Citrullinated Protein

scholarly journals POS0647 EFFICACY, SAFETY AND CHARACTERISTICS OF IGURATIMOD-BASED THERAPY IN THE TREATMENT OF UA, ERA AND RA PATIENTS FOR 24 WEEKS: A PROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 561.2-562
Author(s):  
X. Liu ◽  
Z. Sun ◽  
W. Guo ◽  
F. Wang ◽  
L. Song ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Prospective Cohort Study ◽  
Early Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Prospective Cohort ◽  
Combined Treatment ◽  
Serious Adverse Events

Background:Experts emphasize early diagnosis and treatment in RA, but the widely used diagnostic criterias fail to meet the accurate judgment of early rheumatoid arthritis. In 2012, Professor Zhanguo Li took the lead in establishing ERA “Chinese standard”, and its sensitivity and accuracy have been recognized by peers. However, the optimal first-line treatment of patients (pts) with undifferentiated arthritis (UA), early rheumatoid arthritis (ERA), and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are yet to be established.Objectives:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Iguratimod-based (IGU-based) Strategy in the above three types of pts, and to explore the characteristics of the effects of IGU monotherapy and combined treatment.Methods:This prospective cohort study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01548001) was conducted in China. In this phase 4 study pts with RA (ACR 1987 criteria[1]), ERA (not match ACR 1987 criteria[1] but match ACR/EULAR 2010 criteria[2] or 2014 ERA criteria[3]), UA (not match classification criteria for ERA and RA but imaging suggests synovitis) were recruited. We applied different treatments according to the patient’s disease activity at baseline, including IGU monotherapy and combination therapies with methotrexate, hydroxychloroquine, and prednisone. Specifically, pts with LDA and fewer poor prognostic factors were entered the IGU monotherapy group (25 mg bid), and pts with high disease activity were assigned to combination groups. A Chi-square test was applied for comparison. The primary outcomes were the proportion of pts in remission (REM)or low disease activity (LDA) that is DAS28-ESR<2.6 or 3.2 at 24 weeks, as well as the proportion of pts, achieved ACR20, Boolean remission, and good or moderate EULAR response (G+M).Results:A total of 313 pts (26 pts with UA, 59 pts with ERA, and 228 pts with RA) were included in this study. Of these, 227/313 (72.5%) pts completed the 24-week follow-up. The results showed that 115/227 (50.7%), 174/227 (76.7%), 77/227 (33.9%), 179/227 (78.9%) pts achieved DAS28-ESR defined REM and LDA, ACR20, Boolean remission, G+M response, respectively. All parameters continued to decrease in all pts after treatment (Fig 1).Compared with baseline, the three highest decline indexes of disease activity at week 24 were SW28, CDAI, and T28, with an average decline rate of 73.8%, 61.4%, 58.7%, respectively. Results were similar in three cohorts.We performed a stratified analysis of which IGU treatment should be used in different cohorts. The study found that the proportion of pts with UA and ERA who used IGU monotherapy were significantly higher than those in the RA cohort. While the proportion of triple and quadruple combined use of IGU in RA pts was significantly higher than that of ERA and UA at baseline and whole-course (Fig 2).A total of 81/313 (25.8%) pts in this study had adverse events (AE) with no serious adverse events. The main adverse events were infection(25/313, 7.99%), gastrointestinal disorders(13/313, 4.15%), liver dysfunction(12/313, 3.83%) which were lower than 259/2666 (9.71%) in the previous Japanese phase IV study[4].The most common reasons of lost follow-up were: 1) discontinued after remission 25/86 (29.1%); 2) lost 22/86 (25.6%); 3) drug ineffective 19/86 (22.1%).Conclusion:Both IGU-based monotherapy and combined therapies are tolerant and effective for treating UA, ERA, and RA, while the decline in joint symptoms was most significant. Overall, IGU combination treatments were most used in RA pts, while monotherapy was predominant in ERA and UA pts.References:[1]Levin RW, et al. Scand J Rheumatol 1996, 25(5):277-281.[2]Kay J, et al. Rheumatology 2012, 51(Suppl 6):vi5-9.[3]Zhao J, et al. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2014, 32(5):667-673.[4]Mimori T, et al. Mod Rheumatol 2019, 29(2):314-323.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

scholarly journals AB0179 INFLUENCE OF AINFLUENCE OF ANTI-CITRULLINATED PROTEIN/PEPTIDE ANTIBODIES (ACPAS)ON ARTICULAR MANIFESTATIONS, DISEASE ACTIVITY AND STRUCTURAL SEVERITY IN ALGERIAN PATIENTS WITH EARLY RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1115.1-1115
Author(s):  
F. Rahal ◽  
N. Brahumi ◽  
A. Ladjouze-Rezig ◽  
S. Lefkir
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Early Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity Score ◽  
Activity Score ◽  
Symptom Duration ◽  
Early Ra ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Citrullinated Protein ◽  
Peptide Antibodies

Background:Anti-citrullinated protein/peptide antibodies (ACPA) are highly specific and sensitive markers for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). There are also suggested to have a more severe rheumatoid arthritis.Objectives:The aim of this study was to assess the influence of ACPA on disease activity, radiological severity, and functional disability in Algerian patient with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA).Methods:Consecutive early RA patients (symptom duration ≤24 months) recruited were included in the descriptive, longitudinal, prospective study. Demographic, biological, immunological and radiographic data were collected at the time of inclusion in the study. Disease activity as determined by the Disease Activity Score 28-CPR (DAS28- CPR: 4 variables), functional handicap as calculated by Heath Assessment Score (HAQ), and bone and joint damage as evaluated by Sharp-Van der Heijde (SVDH) erosion and narrowing score.Results:One hundred and sixty-one patients with RA were recruited. Patients mean age 43.71±14 years and mean symptom duration at inclusion was 10.48±7 months. Small and larges were affected in 64,3%. The mean ESR was 23,53±15,2 mm/1st hour, and the mean CRP level was 19,42±39.8 mg/l. Rheumatoid Factors (RFs) and Anti-Citrullinated Protein Antibodies (ACPAs) were present in 74% and 88% of patients, respectively. The presence of ACPAs was significantly associated with DAS28 (p=0,004) and HAQ (p=0,002). There was no significant difference in inflammatory markers and radiographic SVDH score between patients with and without ACPAs. Stepwise regression analysis showed that the presence of ACPAs was independently associated with localization when RA affected smalls and larges joint in the same time (OR=5,24; IC 95% 1,224-22,483; p=0,026).Conclusion:These data show that in patients with early RA, ACPAs positivity was significantly associated with articular manifestations, activity disease and functional handicap, but not with structural damage.References:[1]Nikiphorou E, Norton S, Young A, et al. Association between rheumatoid arthritis disease activity, progression of functional limitation and long-term risk of orthopaedic surgery: combined analysis of two prospective cohorts supports EULAR treat to target DAS thresholds. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016;75(12):2080-2086. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-208669.[2]Karimifar M, Salesi M, Farajzadegan Z. The association of anti-CCP1 antibodies with disease activity score 28 (DAS-28) in rheumatoid arthritis. Adv Biomed Res. 2012;1:30. doi:10.4103/2277-9175.98156.[3]Boman A, Brink M, Lundquist A, et al. Antibodies against citrullinated peptides are associated with clinical and radiological outcomes in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: a prospective longitudinal inception cohort study. RMD Open. 2019;5(2):e000946. Published 2019 Sep 3. doi:10.1136/rmdopen-2019-000946.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

scholarly journals Active conventional treatment and three different biological treatments in early rheumatoid arthritis: phase IV investigator initiated, randomised, observer blinded clinical trial

BMJ ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. m4328
Author(s):  
Merete Lund Hetland ◽  
Espen A Haavardsholm ◽  
Anna Rudin ◽  
Dan Nordström ◽  
Michael Nurmohamed ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Early Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Conventional Treatment ◽  
Certolizumab Pegol ◽  
Biological Treatments ◽  
Remission Rates ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Secondary Outcomes ◽  
Citrullinated Protein

Abstract Objective To evaluate and compare benefits and harms of three biological treatments with different modes of action versus active conventional treatment in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. Design Investigator initiated, randomised, open label, blinded assessor, multiarm, phase IV study. Setting Twenty nine rheumatology departments in Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Finland, the Netherlands, and Iceland between 2012 and 2018. Participants Patients aged 18 years and older with treatment naive rheumatoid arthritis, symptom duration less than 24 months, moderate to severe disease activity, and rheumatoid factor or anti-citrullinated protein antibody positivity, or increased C reactive protein. Interventions Randomised 1:1:1:1, stratified by country, sex, and anti-citrullinated protein antibody status. All participants started methotrexate combined with (a) active conventional treatment (either prednisolone tapered to 5 mg/day, or sulfasalazine combined with hydroxychloroquine and intra-articular corticosteroids), (b) certolizumab pegol, (c) abatacept, or (d) tocilizumab. Main outcome measures The primary outcome was adjusted clinical disease activity index remission (CDAI≤2.8) at 24 weeks with active conventional treatment as the reference. Key secondary outcomes and analyses included CDAI remission at 12 weeks and over time, other remission criteria, a non-inferiority analysis, and harms. Results 812 patients underwent randomisation. The mean age was 54.3 years (standard deviation 14.7) and 68.8% were women. Baseline disease activity score of 28 joints was 5.0 (standard deviation 1.1). Adjusted 24 week CDAI remission rates were 42.7% (95% confidence interval 36.1% to 49.3%) for active conventional treatment, 46.5% (39.9% to 53.1%) for certolizumab pegol, 52.0% (45.5% to 58.6%) for abatacept, and 42.1% (35.3% to 48.8%) for tocilizumab. Corresponding absolute differences were 3.9% (95% confidence interval −5.5% to 13.2%) for certolizumab pegol, 9.4% (0.1% to 18.7%) for abatacept, and −0.6% (−10.1% to 8.9%) for tocilizumab. Key secondary outcomes showed no major differences among the four treatments. Differences in CDAI remission rates for active conventional treatment versus certolizumab pegol and tocilizumab, but not abatacept, remained within the prespecified non-inferiority margin of 15% (per protocol population). The total number of serious adverse events was 13 (percentage of patients who experienced at least one event 5.6%) for active conventional treatment, 20 (8.4%) for certolizumab pegol, 10 (4.9%) for abatacept, and 10 (4.9%) for tocilizumab. Eleven patients treated with abatacept stopped treatment early compared with 20-23 patients in the other arms. Conclusions All four treatments achieved high remission rates. Higher CDAI remission rate was observed for abatacept versus active conventional treatment, but not for certolizumab pegol or tocilizumab versus active conventional treatment. Other remission rates were similar across treatments. Non-inferiority analysis indicated that active conventional treatment was non-inferior to certolizumab pegol and tocilizumab, but not to abatacept. The results highlight the efficacy and safety of active conventional treatment based on methotrexate combined with corticosteroids, with nominally better results for abatacept, in treatment naive early rheumatoid arthritis. Trial registration EudraCT2011-004720-35, NCT01491815 .

scholarly journals Impact of Anti-Citrullinated Protein Antibodies on Progressive Systemic Bone Mineral Density Loss in Patients With Early Rheumatoid Arthritis After Two Years of Treat-to-Target

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Serena Bugatti ◽  
Laura Bogliolo ◽  
Antonio Manzo ◽  
Ludovico De Stefano ◽  
Paolo Delvino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Bone Mineral Density ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Bone Mineral ◽  
Early Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Treat To Target ◽  
Mineral Density ◽  
Bone Mineral Density Loss ◽  
Prophylactic Measures ◽  
Citrullinated Protein

ObjectivesTo investigate the association of anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) with changes in systemic bone mineral density (BMD) in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) after two years of treat-to-target.MethodsBMD was measured at the lumbar spine (LS) and femoral neck (FN) in 100 patients with recent onset RA at baseline and after 24 months of treatment aimed at low disease activity (LDA) according to the 28-joints disease activity score (DAS28 &lt;3.2). Multivariable regression analyses were performed to determine independent associations between autoantibodies and other disease and treatment-related parameters with BMD loss.ResultsAfter 24 months, the majority of the patients were at least in LDA (78%), with slightly more ACPA-positive subjects achieving the target. The BMD had significantly decreased at both the LS (mean [SD] percent loss -1.8 [6.2], p=0.03) and the FN (-2.4 [7.3], p=0.03) in ACPA-positive but not in ACPA-negative patients. Consequently, the proportion of patients with reduced BMD (Z score ≤-1) after 24 months was significantly higher among ACPA-positive patients at both the spine (39.5% vs 19.3%, p=0.05) and the hip (37.2% vs 12.2%, p=0.007). The association between ACPA and BMD loss was independent of other variables including age, gender, disease activity, cumulative dose of glucocorticoids and duration of therapy with bisphosphonates at the LS but not the FN.ConclusionsACPA are associated with ongoing BMD loss at the spine despite suppression of inflammation and adoption of prophylactic measures. ACPA-positive RA patients should be therefore strictly monitored for the development of osteoporosis.

AB0173 Role of Anti Citrullinated Protein Antibodies in Follow-Up and Radiographic Damage in A Group of Patients with Early Rheumatoid Arthritis

2016 ◽  
Vol 75 (Suppl 2) ◽  
pp. 955.3-956
Author(s):  
C. Carrasco Cubero ◽  
E. Vergara Prieto ◽  
I. Alcalá Peña ◽  
J.L. Άlvarez Vega ◽  
J.M. Salazar Vallinas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Early Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Radiographic Damage ◽  
Citrullinated Protein

scholarly journals Predictive factors related to the progression of periodontal disease in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: a cohort study

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana María Heredia-P ◽  
Gloria Inés Lafaurie ◽  
Wilson Bautista-Molano ◽  
Tamy Goretty Trujillo ◽  
Philippe Chalem-Choueka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Periodontal Disease ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Early Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Predictive Factors ◽  
Related Protein ◽  
C Reactive Protein ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Generalised Linear Mixed Model

Abstract Background Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and periodontal disease are inter-related conditions. However, factors predictive of periodontal disease progression in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (eRA) are lacking. The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with the progression of clinical attachment loss (CAL) in interproximal dental sites of eRA patients. Methods Twenty-eight eRA patients were evaluated for the progression of CAL at 280 interproximal dental sites at 1 year of follow-up. Markers of RA activity (rheumatoid factor, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and C-reactive protein), a marker of bone resorption (Dickkopf-related protein 1), Disease Activity Score 28 and Simple Disease Activity Index were included as potential systemic predictive factors. Plaque index, gingival index, pocket depth, clinical attachment level and Dickkopf-related protein 1 in crevicular fluid at baseline were included as potential local predictive factors. Data were analysed in a hierarchical structure using generalised linear mixed models for progression at each site (> 2 mm) during follow-up. Results C-reactive protein level was the most important predictive systemic factor for the progression of CAL. The mean CAL and a high degree of gingival inflammation in interproximal sites at baseline were important predictive local factors (p <  0.0001). Patients who received combined treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and corticosteroids exhibited less CAL (p <  0.0001). The predictive value of the generalised linear mixed model for progression was 85%. Conclusions Systemic factors, including RA disease activity and baseline periodontal condition, were associated with periodontal progression. Pharmacological treatment may affect periodontal progression in patients with early RA.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document