Preference Importance Ratings among African American and White Nursing Home Residents

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Nytasia M. Hicks ◽  
Allison R. Heid ◽  
Katherine M. Abbott ◽  
Kendall Leser ◽  
Kimberly Van Haitsma
2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 836-836
Author(s):  
Nytasia Hicks ◽  
Katherine Abbott ◽  
Allison Heid ◽  
Kendall Leser ◽  
Kimberly Van Haitsma

Abstract Background: The Preferences for Everyday Living Inventory (PELI) was developed to assess the psychosocial preferences of older adults receiving home care (PELI-HC) and then revised for nursing home residents (PELI-NH). While the PELI-HC has been tested to identify patterns in preference ratings by race, the PELI-NH has not. We sought to explore whether the PELI-NH tool captures differences in preference ratings of African-American and White NH residents. Methods: Preference assessment interviews were conducted with NH residents (n = 317). Analysis via a Mann-Whitney U test, results show that 46 of 72 (63.88%) a preference importance items were not statistically different between African-American and White NH residents. Additionally, African-Americans reported greater importance than White older adult NH residents in 26 of 72 (36%) preference importance items. Conclusion/Implications: It appears that the PELI-NH can test group differences in preference importance among African-American and White NH residents; implications for practice will be discussed. Part of a symposium sponsored by the Research in Quality of Care Interest Group.


2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (7) ◽  
pp. 1259-1277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maricruz Rivera-Hernandez ◽  
Amit Kumar ◽  
Gary Epstein-Lubow ◽  
Kali S. Thomas

Objective: This article examines differences in nursing home use and quality among Medicare beneficiaries, in both Medicare Advantage and fee-for-service, newly admitted to nursing homes with Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias (ADRD). Method: Retrospective, national, population-based study of Medicare residents newly admitted to nursing homes with ADRD by race and ethnic group. Our analytic sample included 1,302,099 nursing home residents—268,181 with a diagnosis of ADRD—in 13,532 nursing homes from 2014. Results: We found that a larger share of Hispanic Medicare residents that are admitted to nursing homes have ADRD compared with African American and White beneficiaries. Both Hispanics and African Americans with ADRD received care in segregated nursing homes with fewer resources and lower quality of care compared with White residents. Discussion: These results have implications for targeted efforts to achieve health care equity and quality improvement efforts among nursing homes that serve minority patients.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 91-91
Author(s):  
Caroline Madrigal ◽  
Lan Jiang ◽  
Whitney Mills ◽  
Wen-Chih Wu ◽  
Diane Berish ◽  
...  

Abstract Preference-based care is required by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and is linked to improved quality of nursing home care. The federally mandated Minimum Data Set (3.0) Preference Assessment Tool (PAT) is a 16-item standardized measure used to facilitate preference-based care through rating how important residents’ daily and activity preferences are. Little work has explored how Veterans’ unique demographic backgrounds and functional/cognitive abilities may influence how they rate their preferences (compared to general nursing home residents). Therefore, the purpose of this retrospective study was to explore the relationships between Veterans’ demographic/clinical characteristics and number of preference importance ratings. Our sample (n=194,068) consisted of Veterans admitted to community nursing homes after hospitalization at a Veterans Affairs facility for heart failure between 2010-2015. We used ordinal regression to explore predictors of preference importance ratings. Veterans were, on average, 78-years-old (SD=10.42) and mostly male (95%), white (81%), married (46%), cognitively intact (74%) with extensive functional impairment (60%) and minimal depressive symptoms (74%). Veterans rated an average of 12.47 preferences as important (SD=2.86; range=0-16). Veterans living with cognitive impairment, depression, and extensive functional impairment who were not married or separated had a lower number of important preferences (all p<0.0001). Veterans that were female, under the age of 85, and any race but white had a higher number of important preferences (all p<0.0001). Discussion will include implications for planning and delivering preference-based care for Veterans as well as next steps in research and practice to better understand and fulfill Veterans’ everyday care preferences.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document