Shifting psychosocial oncology care to telepsychology during the COVID-19 pandemic

Author(s):  
Shannon Myers Virtue ◽  
Hillary L. Howrey ◽  
Nicole M. Duffy ◽  
Meaghan Wallace
2021 ◽  
pp. 385-392
Author(s):  
Jesse R. Fann ◽  
Julia Ruark ◽  
Michael Sharpe

This chapter describes how the collaborative care model can be used to integrate psychosocial care into cancer care. It also describes the evolution of, and evidence for, the collaborative care approach in cancer services. Collaborative care consists of systematic identification of need, integrated delivery of psychosocial care by care managers with specialist supervision, and the stepping up of care based on the systematic measurement of outcomes. Trials of this approach for the management of depression and pain in patients with cancer have found it to be feasible to deliver, effective in improving outcomes, and cost-effective. The chapter describes how to overcome patient, provider, and institutional challenges in providing psychosocial care in diverse oncology settings. It concludes by proposing practical steps for implementing and sustaining an integrated psychosocial oncology service based on the principles of collaborative care.


2015 ◽  
pp. 717-725
Author(s):  
Jesse R. Fann ◽  
Jennifer Sexton

2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 523-530 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luzia Travado ◽  
Joaquim C. Reis ◽  
Maggie Watson ◽  
Josep Borràs

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (12) ◽  
pp. 2041-2047
Author(s):  
Kailey E. Roberts ◽  
Greta Jankauskaite ◽  
Elizabeth Slivjak ◽  
Lisa Rubin ◽  
Sherry Schachter ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadisha Ratnasekera ◽  
Irosha Perera ◽  
Pushpakumara Kandapolaarachchige ◽  
Gayan Surendra ◽  
Nadeena Jayasuriya ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (11) ◽  
pp. 2247-2249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zimeng Li ◽  
Jinjiang Li ◽  
Lili Tang ◽  
Ying Pang

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 699-705 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janet Ellis ◽  
Judy Lin ◽  
Andrew Walsh ◽  
Christopher Lo ◽  
Frances A. Shepherd ◽  
...  

Purpose This study examines the rate and prediction of referral for specialized psychosocial oncology care in 326 patients with metastatic GI or lung cancer. Patients and Methods Referral information was abstracted from medical records and hospital databases. Patients completed measures of psychosocial and physical distress and functioning. Results Routine referral occurred in 33% of patients, and in 42% and 44%, respectively, of those scoring high on measures of depression (Beck Depression Inventory [BDI]-II ≥ 15) and hopelessness (Beck Hopelessness Scale ≥ 8). Univariate analyses indicated that referral was associated with younger age, unmarried status, living alone, presence of more depressive symptoms, hopelessness, and attachment anxiety, and with less social support, self-esteem, and spiritual well-being (all P < .05). Among the significantly depressed (BDI-II ≥ 15), 100% of those less than 40 years of age, but only 22% of those age 70 years or older were referred. Multivariate analyses indicated that referral was associated with younger age, unmarried status, and presence of more depressive symptoms. Moreover, increasing age was associated with a progressively lower likelihood of referral independent of the level of distress. Conclusion Routine referral of patients with metastatic cancer for psychosocial oncology care was predicted by presence of more severe depressive symptoms, younger age, and unmarried status. The rate of referral progressively declined with each decade of age, even among those with significant distress. These findings are consistent with some aspects of Andersen's model of health care utilization. The extent to which referred patients represent those who are most likely to benefit deserves further investigation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document