Response to Letter to the Editors: “Non–Group A Streptococci as Common Isolates on Throat Culture Among College Students With Pharyngitis”

2011 ◽  
Vol 59 (8) ◽  
pp. 772-772
Author(s):  
Pamela P. Talley
PEDIATRICS ◽  
1979 ◽  
Vol 64 (6) ◽  
pp. 904-912
Author(s):  
Edward L. Kaplan ◽  
Robert Couser ◽  
Barbara Ballard Huwe ◽  
Carolyn Mckay ◽  
Lewis W. Wannamaker

One hundred ninety-six individuals, 86 with clinically overt pharyngotonsillitis and 110 of their clinically negative contacts were studied to evaluate the sensitivity and the specificity of quantitative saliva cultures for group A β-hemolytic streptococci. We also compared this technique with semiquantitative throat cultures as a means of isolating group A streptococci and of differentiating the streptococcal carrier state from patients with bona fide streptococcal upper respiratory tract infection as defmed by the presence of an antibody response. The data indicate that the throat culture is a more reliable means of identifying group A β-hemolytic streptococci in the upper respiratory tract than is the saliva culture. The converse is true for non-group A β-hemolytic streptococci; the saliva culture is a much better means for isolating these organisms. In individuals positive by both techniques we found good correlation between the degree of positivity of the saliva culture and the degree of positivity of the throat culture. Furthermore, while there was a definite trend for individuals with strongly positive cultures to demonstrate more often an antibody rise in either antistreptolysin O and/or antideoxynibonuclease B—indicating bona fide infection—this relationship was not sufficiently constant to provide a clear differentiation. This study also indicates that discordance (one positive, one negative) of simultaneous duplicate semiquantitative throat cultures is much more common among individuals who do not show an antibody response ("carriers") than among those with an antibody response (bona fide infection). This study confirms our previous observations suggesting that the presence of C-reactive protein in the serum of patients with a positive culture for group A streptococci and clinical signs and symptoms of pharyngitis is often an indication of true streptococcal upper respiratory tract infection, and that even with a positive saliva culture at the initial visit, a negative C-reactive protein is only infrequently (25%) associated with an antibody response.


1980 ◽  
Vol 96 (3) ◽  
pp. 431-433 ◽  
Author(s):  
William H. Lyerly ◽  
James W. Bass ◽  
Lewis B. Harden ◽  
M. Jean Cardin

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 93 (3) ◽  
pp. 539-539
Author(s):  
Ellen R. Wald

I read with great interest the article entitled "Duration of Positive Throat Cultures for Group A Streptococci After Initiation of Antibiotic Therapy" by Snellman et al.1 The study involved 47 patients in whom streptococcal pharyngitis was diagnosed, who were randomly selected to receive three different antimicrobial regimens with a varying number of doses before the performance of a repeat throat culture. The degree of positivity of the persistently positive cultures (1+, 2+, or 3+) was not shown.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 101 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 171-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Schwartz ◽  
S. Michael Marcy ◽  
William R. Phillips ◽  
Michael A. Gerber ◽  
Scott F. Dowell

Accurate diagnosis of group A streptococcal pharyngitis and appropriate antimicrobial therapy are important, particularly to prevent nonsuppurative sequelae such as rheumatic fever. Most episodes of sore throat, however, are caused by viral agents. Clinical findings cannot reliably differentiate streptococcal from viral pharyngitis and most physicians tend to overestimate the probability of a streptococcal infection based on history and physical examination alone. Therefore, diagnosis should be based on results of a throat culture or an antigen-detection test with throat culture backup. Presumptively starting therapy pending results of a culture is discouraged because treatment often continues despite a negative test result. Other bacterial causes of pharyngitis are uncommon and often can be diagnosed based on nonpharyngeal findings. Penicillin remains the drug of choice for streptococcal pharyngitis because of its effectiveness, relatively narrow spectrum, and low cost. No group A streptococci are resistant to β-lactam antibiotics. High rates of resistance to macrolides has been documented in several areas; in Finland, decreased national rates of macrolide use led to a decline in the proportion of macrolide-resistant group A streptococci.


1978 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 725-728 ◽  
Author(s):  
A E Kholy ◽  
R Facklam ◽  
G Sabri ◽  
J Rotta

The use of a microtechnique (modified nitrous acid extraction) to test samples from 150 school children and from patients with acute follicular tonsillitis has indicated that group A streptococci in the throat can be identified from tonsillar scrapings in 30 min. The results are comparable to the grouping results obtained by standard throat culture techniques and the Lancefield procedure for grouping. No cross-reaction with other bacteria or cellular material occurs. Study has also shown that the nitrous acid extraction yields three- to fourfold more polysaccharides than the Lancefield hot-HCl of Fuller formamide techniques. The use of the microtechnique leads to another 20-fold concentration of the antigen. Immune salting-out effect could be obtained with 1.00 M sodium acetate. Such molarity is too low to cause nonspecific slating out. It leads to a strong ampliciation of the precipitin reaction.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document