Ecosystem Services in a Transitional Forest Landscape: Shifting Trajectories in Southeast Michigan, USA

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 457-472
Author(s):  
Nathan Clay ◽  
Kayla Yurco ◽  
Arun Agrawal ◽  
Lauren Persha
2016 ◽  
Vol 64 ◽  
pp. 319-334 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed Alamgir ◽  
Stephen M. Turton ◽  
Colin J. Macgregor ◽  
Petina L. Pert

2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 495-506
Author(s):  
James Rodríguez-Echeverry ◽  
Cristian Echeverría ◽  
Carlos Oyarzún ◽  
Luis Morales

Forests ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 465 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabella De Meo ◽  
Maria Cantiani ◽  
Fabrizio Ferretti ◽  
Alessandro Paletto

In the last decades, the ecosystem services (ES) concept has become one of the main challenges of study and discussion in the scientific community. The quantitative and qualitative assessment of ES is as a tool to address forest management planning on a local scale. Forest landscape management planning is the most suitable level for integrating social needs and demands in the enhancement of different forest ES. Some regions in Italy have developed forest landscape management plans taking into account the social preferences for the different ES. In this paper, we refer to five case studies in three pilot areas in Italy. A survey collected and analyzed the opinions and preferences, from 362 stakeholders, for ten ES included in three categories (provisioning, regulating and cultural services). The main aim of this study is to understand what type of variables (study area, the groups of interest and socio-demographic characteristics of respondents) most influence stakeholder preferences for ES. The results show that for the sample of stakeholders involved in the survey, the most important ES category is regulating services followed by cultural services. In addition, the results show that the group of stakeholders’ interest is the most important variable influencing their preferences for ES.


2021 ◽  
pp. 105741
Author(s):  
Ali Akbar Jafarzadeh ◽  
Ali Mahdavi ◽  
Seyed Rashid Fallah Shamsi ◽  
Rasoul Yousefpour

2019 ◽  
Vol 445 ◽  
pp. 37-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rupert Seidl ◽  
Katharina Albrich ◽  
Karlheinz Erb ◽  
Herbert Formayer ◽  
David Leidinger ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (15) ◽  
pp. 6077 ◽  
Author(s):  
Esther Reith ◽  
Elizabeth Gosling ◽  
Thomas Knoke ◽  
Carola Paul

Agroforestry has been promoted as a key forest landscape restoration (FLR) option to restore ecosystem services in degraded tropical landscapes. We investigated the share and type of agroforestry selected in an optimized landscape, accounting for a mosaic of alternative forest landscape restoration options (reforestation and natural succession) and forest and common agricultural land-uses. We extend previous studies on multi-objective robust optimization and the analytic hierarchy process by a systematic sensitivity analysis to assess the influence of incorporating agroforestry into a landscape. This approach accounts for multiple objectives concurrently, yet data and computational requirements are relatively low. Our results show that experts from different backgrounds perceive agroforestry (i.e., alley cropping and silvopasture) very positively. Inclusion of large shares of agroforestry (41% share of landscape) in the FLR mix enhanced simulated ecosystem service provision. Our results demonstrate that landscapes with high shares of agroforestry may also comprise of high shares of natural forest. However, landscapes dominated by single agroforestry systems showed lower landscape multifunctionality than heterogeneous landscapes. In the ongoing effort to create sustainable landscapes, our approach contributes to an understanding of interrelations between land-covers and uncertain provisions of ecosystem services in circumstances with scarce data.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document