Experiences of health and aging for younger adults in long-term care: a social-ecological multi-method approach

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-20
Author(s):  
Brittany V. Barber ◽  
Lori E. Weeks ◽  
Natasha A. Spassiani ◽  
Brad A. Meisner
2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S241-S242
Author(s):  
Barbara Hanratty ◽  
Katie Brittain ◽  
Rachel Stocker ◽  
Karen Spilsbury

Abstract This multi-method research explores the challenges family practitioners and long-term care facilities face when they work together. It seeks to understand how different responses to these challenges may influence the delivery of care. Whilst different services have their own values, aims, structures and processes, all are contending with constrained resources and frequent organisational change. Our findings from a large qualitative study and analysis of routine health data are organised around the micro (individual), meso (organisational) and macro (system) factors that influence the organisation and delivery of resident care. In this presentation, we draw out the interplay between these levels, and how each shapes and is shaped by the changing demands and nature of care. This presentation will bring new insights into primary care for long-term care facilities, through the perspectives of those who experience and provide care in that setting.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 701-707
Author(s):  
Poland Lai

The COVID-19 casualties in long-term care homes (nursing homes) around the world are usually described as our collective failure in care towards older adults. The plight of younger long-term care residents appears to be forgotten in the midst of long-term care tragedies. This article summarises a small number of key informant interviews (conducted in 2017) that shed light on why younger adults reside in long-term care homes in Ontario, Canada. To put it simply, the younger residents have nowhere to go. Diverting younger people with disabilities from long-term care will help alleviate pressures on long-term care systems as respective governments race to reform them.


2011 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-21
Author(s):  
Sara Joffe

In order to best meet the needs of older residents in long-term care settings, clinicians often develop programs designed to streamline and improve care. However, many individuals are reluctant to embrace change. This article will discuss strategies that the speech-language pathologist (SLP) can use to assess and address the source of resistance to new programs and thereby facilitate optimal outcomes.


2001 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-24
Author(s):  
Carol Winchester ◽  
Cathy Pelletier ◽  
Pete Johnson

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (15) ◽  
pp. 64-67
Author(s):  
George Barnes ◽  
Joseph Salemi

The organizational structure of long-term care (LTC) facilities often removes the rehab department from the interdisciplinary work culture, inhibiting the speech-language pathologist's (SLP's) communication with the facility administration and limiting the SLP's influence when implementing clinical programs. The SLP then is unable to change policy or monitor the actions of the care staff. When the SLP asks staff members to follow protocols not yet accepted by facility policy, staff may be unable to respond due to confusing or conflicting protocol. The SLP needs to involve members of the facility administration in the policy-making process in order to create successful clinical programs. The SLP must overcome communication barriers by understanding the needs of the administration to explain how staff compliance with clinical goals improves quality of care, regulatory compliance, and patient-family satisfaction, and has the potential to enhance revenue for the facility. By taking this approach, the SLP has a greater opportunity to increase safety, independence, and quality of life for patients who otherwise may not receive access to the appropriate services.


2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maryam Navaie-Waliser ◽  
Aubrey L. Spriggs ◽  
Penny H. Feldman

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document