scholarly journals Systolic fluid–structure interaction model of the congenitally bicuspid aortic valve: assessment of modelling requirements

2014 ◽  
Vol 18 (12) ◽  
pp. 1305-1320 ◽  
Author(s):  
May Y.S. Kuan ◽  
Daniel M. Espino
2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 739-751 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Maria Tango ◽  
Jacob Salmonsmith ◽  
Andrea Ducci ◽  
Gaetano Burriesci

2015 ◽  
Vol 48 (10) ◽  
pp. 1737-1744 ◽  
Author(s):  
Govinda Balan Kalyana Sundaram ◽  
Komarakshi R. Balakrishnan ◽  
Ramarathnam Krishna Kumar

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wentao Yan ◽  
Jianming Li ◽  
Wenshuo Wang ◽  
Lai Wei ◽  
Shengzhang Wang

The bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is a congenital malformation of the aortic valve with a variety of structural features. The current research on BAV mainly focuses on the systolic phase, while ignoring the diastolic hemodynamic characteristics and valve mechanics. The purpose of this study is to compare the differences in hemodynamics and mechanical properties of BAV with different phenotypes throughout the cardiac cycle by means of numerical simulation. Based on physiological anatomy, we established an idealized tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) model and six phenotypes of BAV models (including Type 0 a–p, Type 0 lat, Type 1 L–R, Type 1 N-L, Type 1 R-N, and Type 2), and simulated the dynamic changes of the aortic valve during the cardiac cycle using the fluid–structure interaction method. The morphology of the leaflets, hemodynamic parameters, flow patterns, and strain were analyzed. Compared with TAV, the cardiac output and effective orifice area of different BAV phenotypes decreased certain degree, along with the peak velocity and mean pressure difference increased both. Among all BAV models, Type 2 exhibited the worst hemodynamic performance. During the systole, obvious asymmetric flow field was observed in BAV aorta, which was related to the orientation of BAV. Higher strain was generated in diastole for BAV models. The findings of this study suggests specific differences in the hemodynamic characteristics and valve mechanics of different BAV phenotypes, including different severity of stenosis, flow patterns, and leaflet strain, which may be critical for prediction of other subsequent aortic diseases and differential treatment strategy for certain BAV phenotype.


2011 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 173-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gil Marom ◽  
Rami Haj-Ali ◽  
Ehud Raanani ◽  
Hans-Joachim Schäfers ◽  
Moshe Rosenfeld

Author(s):  
V. Govindarajan ◽  
J. Mousel ◽  
S. C. Vigmostad ◽  
H. S. Udaykumar ◽  
M. M. Levack ◽  
...  

Aortic valve diseases such as congenital bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) and progressive calcification in tricuspid valves affect the hemodynamics in the aortic arch. In addition to leaflet calcification, BAVs are associated with other ailments such as aortic coarctation, aneurysm and dissection [1]. It has also been observed that progressive calcification is accelerated in the case of BAVs compared to normal tricuspid valves. While it is not yet known whether the geometric distortion in BAVs is the main cause of calcification [2] in these valves, the distortion in the leaflets may give rise to altered stresses during the deformation processes which might play a role in accelerating the calcification process in BAVs. In addition, the altered flow caused by the change in geometry could alter the local fluid stresses during the opening phase, which might affect the endothelial lining of the aortic wall. Analyzing and comparing BAV and tricuspid aortic valves as a fluid-structure interaction problem will help determine the stress distribution on the leaflets during opening phase, and enable the examination of altered flow dynamics in the ascending aorta. In this study, the opening phase of a patient-specific bicuspid aortic valve is analyzed at physiological conditions and compared with the opening phase of a tricuspid aortic valve.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document