Deep sequencing of BCR-ABL1 kinase domain mutations in chronic myeloid leukemia patients with resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors

2018 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
pp. 200-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yucel Erbilgin ◽  
Ahmet Emre Eskazan ◽  
Ozden Hatirnaz Ng ◽  
Ayse Salihoglu ◽  
Tugrul Elverdi ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahboobeh Shojaei ◽  
Hamid Rezvani ◽  
Azita Azarkeivan ◽  
Behzad Poopak

Abstract Objective Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are considered standard first-line treatment in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia. Because ABL kinase domain mutations are the most common causes of treatment resistance, their prevalence and assessment during treatment may predict subsequent response to therapy. Methods The molecular response in Bcr-Abl1IS was tested via quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. We used the direct sequencing technique to discover the mutations in the ABL kinase domain. The IRIS trial established a standard baseline for measurement – (100% BCR-ABL1 on the ‘international scale’) and a major molecular response (good response to therapy) was defined as a 3-log reduction in the amount of BCR-ABL1 – 0.1% BCR-ABL1 on the international scale. Results We observed 11 different mutations in 13 patients, including E255K, which had the highest mutation rate. A lack of hematologic response was found in 22 patients, who showed a significantly higher incidence of mutations. Conclusion Detection of kinase domain mutations is a reliable method for choosing the best treatment strategy based on patients’ conditions, avoiding ineffective treatments, and running high-cost protocols in patients with acquired resistance to TKIs.


Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (5) ◽  
pp. 1208-1215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simona Soverini ◽  
Andreas Hochhaus ◽  
Franck E. Nicolini ◽  
Franz Gruber ◽  
Thoralf Lange ◽  
...  

AbstractMutations in the Bcr-Abl kinase domain may cause, or contribute to, resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in chronic myeloid leukemia patients. Recommendations aimed to rationalize the use of BCR-ABL mutation testing in chronic myeloid leukemia have been compiled by a panel of experts appointed by the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) and European Treatment and Outcome Study and are here reported. Based on a critical review of the literature and, whenever necessary, on panelists' experience, key issues were identified and discussed concerning: (1) when to perform mutation analysis, (2) how to perform it, and (3) how to translate results into clinical practice. In chronic phase patients receiving imatinib first-line, mutation analysis is recommended only in case of failure or suboptimal response according to the ELN criteria. In imatinib-resistant patients receiving an alternative TKI, mutation analysis is recommended in case of hematologic or cytogenetic failure as provisionally defined by the ELN. The recommended methodology is direct sequencing, although it may be preceded by screening with other techniques, such as denaturing-high performance liquid chromatography. In all the cases outlined within this abstract, a positive result is an indication for therapeutic change. Some specific mutations weigh on TKI selection.


Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (12) ◽  
pp. 4005-4011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge Cortes ◽  
Elias Jabbour ◽  
Hagop Kantarjian ◽  
C. Cameron Yin ◽  
Jianqin Shan ◽  
...  

AbstractDasatinib and nilotinib are potent tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) with activity against many imatinib-resistant chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) clones with BCR-ABL kinase domain (KD) mutations, except T315I. We assessed for changes in the BCR-ABL KD mutation status in 112 patients with persistent CML who received a second-generation TKI after imatinib failure. Sixty-seven different KD mutations were detected before the start of therapy with a second TKI, with T315I seen in 15%. Equal numbers of patients received nilotinib or dasatinib following imatinib, and 18 received 3 TKIs. Response rates were similar for patients with and without mutations, regardless of mutation site except for T315I. Overall, 29 patients (26%) developed new KD mutations after therapy with a second (n = 24) or third (n = 5) TKI, but only 4 (4%) developed T315I. In 73% of cases, the KD mutations that persisted or developed following switch to new TKI were at sites also found in prior in vitro TKI mutagenesis assays. Although there is only a mild increase in mutation frequency with sequential TKI treatment, novel mutations do occur and mutation regression/acquisition/persistence generally reflects the in vitro differential sensitivity predicted for each TKI. In this study, there was no marked increase in development of T315I.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document