sequential treatment
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

731
(FIVE YEARS 181)

H-INDEX

44
(FIVE YEARS 6)

2021 ◽  
pp. jim-2021-002159
Author(s):  
Jinxiang Yu ◽  
Qianyun Zhang ◽  
Jie Li ◽  
Zhaohui Si ◽  
Yuanyuan Guo ◽  
...  

This article aimed to investigate the effects of the administration method of pemetrexed and cisplatin on the efficacy and safety of treating non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and the intrinsic molecular mechanism. Subcutaneous injection of A549 cells into BALB/C nude mice was used to explore the efficacy of different administration methods of pemetrexed and cisplatin in vivo. Immunogenic cell death (ICD) was evaluated by ATP secretion, ecto-CALR expression, and high mobility group protein 1 release. Western blot, qRT-PCR, and immunohistochemical staining were applied to detect the expression of apoptosis, cell cycle, and stimulator of interferon genes (STING) pathway-related markers. Immune microenvironment was evaluated by secretion of cytokines, infiltration of CD8+ T cells, and expression of programmed death molecular ligand-1 (PD-L1). Sequential treatment with pemetrexed and cisplatin inhibited A549 cell-driven tumor formation in nude mice and regulated the expression of apoptosis and cell cycle-related genes. STING pathway and ICD were further activated by sequential treatment with pemetrexed and cisplatin. This sequential administration method increased the levels of interferon β, tumor necrosis factor α, interleukin 12, and C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 10, enhanced the infiltration of CD8+ T cells, and upregulated the expression of PD-L1. Sequential administration of pemetrexed and cisplatin in the treatment of mouse NSCLC model may have a better effect than combination of drugs, providing theoretical basis and potential guidance for clinical medication.


2021 ◽  
Vol 300 ◽  
pp. 113699
Author(s):  
Altantsetseg Buyanjargal ◽  
Jiyoung Kang ◽  
Brent E. Sleep ◽  
Sung-Wook Jeen

Author(s):  
Igor Snast ◽  
Moshe Lapidoth ◽  
Assi Levi

Abstract The sequential application of fractional ablative/10,600 nm/CO2 followed by 1570 nm non-ablative laser treatment might produce better results than applying either laser treatment alone. However, histological data regarding the safety of this combination is lacking. This study aimed to assess and compare clinical effects, histological tissue damage, and wound healing after monochromatic and sequential fractional laser treatments. In this prospective porcine model study, three adult female pigs were each irradiated using three different wavelengths: (a) monochromatic fractional ablative CO2 laser; (b) monochromatic fractional non-ablative 1570 nm laser; (c) sequential fractional 10,600 nm/CO2 followed by 1570 nm laser treatment. There were six power levels in the monochromatic 1570 nm laser, five in the 10,600 nm/CO2, and five in the sequential treatment. The immediate skin reaction (ISR), crusting and adverse effects, was evaluated across different time points throughout the healing process. Wound biopsies were taken at immediately after (0) and at 3, 7, and 14 days after irradiation. Depth and width of craters, and width of coagulation zone were measured and compared. Similar ISR and crusting score values were obtained following the monochromatic and sequential irradiation in a similar dose–response manner. During 14 days of follow-up, the skin looked intact and non-infected with no signs of necrosis. The mean depth and width of craters were comparable only at the maximal energy level (240 mJ) of CO2 laser, with the coagulation size greater after the sequential treatment. In histology, a similar wound healing was evident. On day 3, crusts were observed above all lesions as was epithelial regeneration. The sequential irradiation with 10,600 nm/CO2 and 1570 nm lasers did not pose any additional risk compared to the risk of each laser alone.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Farshad Moradi Kashkooli ◽  
M. Soltani

AbstractThe development of an in silico approach that evaluates and identifies appropriate treatment protocols for individuals could help grow personalized treatment and increase cancer patient lifespans. With this motivation, the present study introduces a novel approach for sequential treatment cycles based on simultaneously examining drug delivery, tumor growth, and chemotherapy efficacy. This model incorporates the physical conditions of tumor geometry, including tumor, capillary network, and normal tissue assuming real circumstances, as well as the intravascular and interstitial fluid flow, drug concentration, chemotherapy efficacy, and tumor recurrence. Three treatment approaches—maximum tolerated dose (MTD), metronomic chemotherapy (MC), and chemo-switching (CS)—as well as different chemotherapy schedules are investigated on a real tumor geometry extracted from image. Additionally, a sensitivity analysis of effective parameters of drug is carried out to evaluate the potential of using different other drugs in cancer treatment. The main findings are: (i) CS, MC, and MTD have the best performance in reducing tumor cells, respectively; (ii) multiple doses raise the efficacy of drugs that have slower clearance, higher diffusivity, and lower to medium binding affinities; (iii) the suggested approach to eradicating tumors is to reduce their cells to a predetermined rate through chemotherapy and then apply adjunct therapy.


2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Louis Saint-Denis ◽  
Etienne Simon ◽  
Muriel Brix

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document