Prognostic impact of serum soluble interleukin-2 receptor level at diagnosis in elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with R-CHOP

2018 ◽  
Vol 60 (3) ◽  
pp. 734-741 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kento Umino ◽  
Shin-Ichiro Fujiwara ◽  
Daisuke Minakata ◽  
Chihiro Yamamoto ◽  
Akiko Meguro ◽  
...  
Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 1591-1591
Author(s):  
Nobuhiko Yamauchi ◽  
Kazunari Aoki ◽  
June Takeda ◽  
Yuki Funayama ◽  
Aiko Kato ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1591 Introduction The use of fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (PET) to aid the prognosis of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) after treatment with rituximab-containing combination chemotherapy was investigated. Several studies report that less than 20 % of patients who are PET-negative and more than 85 % of PET-positive patients will experience lymphoma recurrence. Since therapy for DLBCL recurrence remains a major problem, the ability to accurately predict the risk of relapse in PET-negative DLBCL patients after chemotherapy would be extremely beneficial. In this study we focused on levels of serum soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sIL-2R) since several reports indicate that sIL-2R at the time of diagnosis is closely linked to the prognoses of DLBCL patients. We measured sIL-2R levels in DLBCL patients shortly after R-CHOP therapy and investigated whether there was any correlation with patient prognoses. Patients and Methods This was a retrospective pooled analysis of DLBCL patients treated with R-CHOP in our institute. Patients were included if they were under the age of 80, had an International Prognostic Index (IPI) score of more than two, and had received R-CHOP with curative intent. Patients who received salvage chemotherapies due to insufficient responses to R-CHOP were also included. We excluded patients with low IPI scores as their sIL-2R levels at the time of diagnosis were usually in the normal range. Patients were also excluded if R-CHOP could not be continued for reasons other than disease progression. sIL-2R and PET analyses were performed when patients first visited the institute after completing 6–8 cycles of R-CHOP. Patients were divided into three groups: Group A consisted of patients who had completed R-CHOP, were PET-negative and whose sIL-2R levels had returned to normal (<600 mg/dl); Group B consisted of patients who had completed R-CHOP and were PET-negative, but whose sIL-2R levels had remained high (>=600mg/dl); Group C consisted of patients who had switched to salvage therapies as well as those who remained PET-positive after completing R-CHOP. Overall survival (OS) was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test was used for comparisons within each group. A multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to adjust for IPI scores. Results From January, 2006 to January, 2012, a total of 178 DLBCL patients aged less than 80 years were referred to our institution, and 70 of these patients were included in this analysis. The median age of patients was 68 years (range 37–79 years), 96 % had advanced stage DLBCL, and 77 % had elevated lactate dehydrogenase levels. 30% of patients had ECOG performance status (PS) less than 2. The median sIL-2R level at the time of diagnosis was 2676 mg/dl (range 612–48000 mg/dl). The numbers of patients assigned to groups A, B, and C were 28 (40 %), 18 (26 %), and 24 (34 %), respectively. A Fisher's exact test showed no significant differences in IPI scores between the three groups (p=0.453). A Mann-Whitney test showed no significant differences in sIL-2R levels at the time of diagnosis between the three groups (A; median 2660 mg/dl, range 612–19000 mg/dl, B; 2905 mg/dl, 970–37100 mg/dl, C; 4347 mg/dl, 734–48000 mg/dl). Patients in groups A and B received 6–8 cycles of R-CHOP (median 7 cycles). Patients in group C received 1–4 salvage treatments (median 2 treatments) before or after completion of R-CHOP (median 6 cycles, range 2–8 cycles). After a median follow-up time of 36 months (range 5–60 months), 24 deaths had occurred (including 20 due to lymphoma), and the 3 year OS rate for the entire cohort was 65.5 % [95 % confidence interval (CI), 51.7–76.2 %]. The 3 year unadjusted OS rate of patients in groups A, B, and C was 95.2% [95%CI, 70.7–99.3%], 60.7% [95%CI, 31.3–80.6%] and 30.6% [95%CI, 12.5–51.0%], respectively (log-rank, p<0.001), (group A vs B; hazard ratio (HR), 10.8; 95%CI, 1.33–88.1; p=0.026, group B vs C; HR, 2.24; 95%CI, 0.91–5.54; p=0.079). Multivariate analysis including IPI score, revealed that 3 year OS for patients in group B was significantly inferior to that for patients in group A (HR, 6.26; 95%CI, 1.29–30.4; p=0.023), but was comparable with that for patients in group C. Conclusion DLBCL patients with an IPI score of more than 2 had an increased risk of relapse if their sIL-2R levels failed to return to normal following R-CHOP treatment, even if they completed 6–8 cycles of R-CHOP and were PET-negative. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2018 ◽  
Vol 57 (24) ◽  
pp. 3521-3528 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akira Tanimura ◽  
Risen Hirai ◽  
Miki Nakamura ◽  
Masataka Takeshita ◽  
Shotaro Hagiwara ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 1647-1647
Author(s):  
Yotaro Ochi ◽  
Nobuhiko Yamauchi ◽  
Yusuke Koba ◽  
Yasuhiro Kazuma ◽  
Yosuke Nagahata ◽  
...  

Abstract <Background> The prognostic impact of interim positron emission tomography scans (I-PET) for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a matter of debate because its positive predictive value (20–80%) is low. Here, we aimed to improve the prognostic impact of I-PET by combining it with interim analysis of serum soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sIL2R) levels, the levels of which at the time of diagnosis are associated with the prognosis of DLBCL. <Patients and Methods> We retrospectively examined data from DLBCL patients diagnosed at our institution between January 2006 and October 2013. Patients were included in the analysis if they met all of the following criteria: six or more cycles of rituximab plus CHOP regimen (R-CHOP); I-PET performed after 2-4 cycles of chemotherapy; and sIL2R levels measured after each cycle. Patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma, primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma, or transformed DLBCL from indolent lymphoma were excluded. I-PET was assessed visually according to the International Harmonization Project criteria. The interim sIL2R (I-IL2) level was defined as the value measured just before the fourth R-CHOP cycle. I-IL2 levels > 800 U/ml, or 2000 U/ml if serum creatinine was > 2.0 mg/dl (sIL2R is influenced by renal function), were regarded as positive. The primary endpoint of the study was progression-free survival (PFS). The unadjusted probabilities of PFS were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The log-lank test and multivariate Cox regression analysis were used to assess the prognostic values of each clinical variable. <Results> In total, 135 patients were enrolled. The median age was 66 years (range, 34–89) and 66 patients (48.9%) were male, 27 (20%) had an ECOG performance status >1, 18 (13.3%) had bulky disease, 81 (60%) had advanced disease, and 61 (45.2%) had a high or high-intermediate International Prognostic Index (IPI) score. The median follow-up time was 25.6 months (range, 6.3–88.7) and the 2 year progression-free survival rate (2-y PFS) of the entire cohort was 72.9% (95% confidence interval (CI), 63.8–80). I-PET and I-IL2 were positive in 47 (34.8%) and 15 (11.1%) patients, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed that a high IPI score, a positive I-PET, and a positive I-IL2 had statistically significant poor prognostic effects on PFS, although gender and bulky disease did not. The three significant variables were entered into multivariate analysis, which identified positive I-PET and I-IL2 values (but not IPI) as independently associated with a poor prognosis. The 2-y PFS was 81.8% (95% CI, 70.4–89.1) for I-PET-negative and 56.3% (95% CI, 40.7–69.3; p<0.001, log rank test) for I-PET positive, respectively. Although a negative I-PET was highly predictive of a favorable outcome, a positive I-PET was of limited clinical value. The 2-y PFS for the 13 patients (9.6%) that were both I-PET- and I-IL2-positive was significantly lower than that of the remaining patients (27.7% [95% CI, 7.1–53.6] and 77.7% [95% CI, 68.4–84.6], respectively; p<0.001). Patients that were positive for both I-PET and I-IL2, rather than patients that were positive for I-PET alone, had a poor outcome. <Conclusion> DLBCL patients that were both I-PET- and I-IL2-positive suffered a high rate of progression; therefore, such patients should be targeted by novel therapeutic approaches. Because the study was based on a retrospective analysis and a limited follow-up period, further studies are needed to confirm the prognostic impact of the combined use of I-PET and I-IL2. Figure 1 Figure 1. Figure 2 Figure 2. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document