Smoldering multiple myeloma: the role of different scoring systems in identifying high-risk patients in real-life practice

2019 ◽  
Vol 60 (12) ◽  
pp. 2968-2974 ◽  
Author(s):  
Federica Cocito ◽  
Silvia Mangiacavalli ◽  
Virginia Valeria Ferretti ◽  
Claudio Salvatore Cartia ◽  
Maya Ganzetti ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alissa Visram ◽  
S. Vincent Rajkumar ◽  
Prashant Kapoor ◽  
Angela Dispenzieri ◽  
Martha Q. Lacy ◽  
...  

AbstractThe Mayo-2018 smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) risk score is used routinely in the clinical setting but has only been validated at diagnosis. In SMM patients, the progression risk decreases over time. However, the utility of applying risk stratification models after diagnosis is unknown. We retrospectively studied 704 SMM patients and applied the Mayo 2018 and IMWG-2020 risk stratification models at annual landmark timepoints up to 5 years post diagnosis. The Mayo-2018 and IMWG-2020 models reliably stratified patients based on progression risk when applied post diagnosis. The respective 2-year progression risk in Mayo-2018 high risk patients versus IMWG-2020 intermediate-high risk patients was 51% versus 62% at the 1-year landmark and 47% versus 45% at the 4-year landmark. We showed that patients categorized at Mayo-2018 high-risk at follow-up had a similar risk of progression if the baseline risk assessment was low-intermediate versus high-risk (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.46–2.36, p = 0.931 at 5-year landmark). Patients migrating to a higher risk category during follow up had a higher progression risk compared to patients with stable/decreased risk categorization. Our findings support the use of these risk scores post-diagnosis and suggest that patients evolving to a high-risk category may benefit from early intervention therapeutic approaches.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 204062072110196
Author(s):  
Albert Oriol ◽  
Laura Abril ◽  
Anna Torrent ◽  
Gladys Ibarra ◽  
Josep-Maria Ribera

The development of several treatment options over the last 2 decades has led to a notable improvement in the survival of patients with multiple myeloma. Despite these advances, the disease remains incurable for most patients. Moreover, standard combinations of alkylating agents, immunomodulatory drugs, proteasome inhibitors, and monoclonal antibodies targeting CD38 and corticoids are exhausted relatively fast in a proportion of high-risk patients. Such high-risk patients account for over 20% of cases and currently represent a major unmet medical need. The challenge of drug resistance requires the development of highly active new agents with a radically different mechanism of action. Several immunotherapeutic modalities, including antibody–drug conjugates and T-cell engagers, appear to be promising choices for patients who develop resistance to standard combinations. Chimeric antigen-receptor-modified T cells (CAR-Ts) targeting B-cell maturation antigen have demonstrated encouraging efficacy and an acceptable safety profile compared with alternative options. Multiple CAR-Ts are in early stages of clinical development, but the first phase III trials with CAR-Ts are ongoing for two of them. After the recent publication of the results of a phase II trial confirming a notable efficacy and acceptable safety profile, idecabtagene vicleucel is the first CAR-T to gain regulatory US Food and Drug Administration approval to treat refractory multiple myeloma patients who have already been exposed to antibodies against CD38, proteasome inhibitors, and immunomodulatory agents and who are refractory to the last therapy. Here, we will discuss the preclinical and clinical development of idecabtagene vicleucel and its future role in the changing treatment landscape of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma.


2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 370-377 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soo-Han Cho ◽  
Yoon-Seon Lee ◽  
Youn-Jung Kim ◽  
Chang Hwan Sohn ◽  
Shin Ahn ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 5
Author(s):  
Eleonora Arboscello ◽  
Irene Ponassi ◽  
Agnese Lomeo ◽  
Maria Nives Parodi ◽  
Paolo Barbera ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 333-339 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Sangiorgi ◽  
Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai ◽  
Pierfrancesco Agostoni ◽  
David Antoniucci ◽  
Eberhard Grube ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document