Altered Body Composition Affects Resting Energy Expenditure and Interpretation Of Body Mass Index In Chiloren With Spinal Cord Injury

2004 ◽  
Vol 27 (sup1) ◽  
pp. S24-S28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanda Liusuwan ◽  
Lana Widman ◽  
Ted Abresch ◽  
Craig M. McDonald
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (17) ◽  
pp. 3911
Author(s):  
Peter Francis Raguindin ◽  
Alessandro Bertolo ◽  
Ramona Maria Zeh ◽  
Gion Fränkl ◽  
Oche Adam Itodo ◽  
...  

The level of injury is linked with biochemical alterations and limitations in physical activity among individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI), which are crucial determinants of body composition. We searched five electronic databases from inception until 22 July 2021. The pooled effect estimates were computed using random-effects models, and heterogeneity was calculated using I2 statistics and the chi-squared test. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. We pooled 40 studies comprising 4872 individuals with SCI (3991 males, 825 females, and 56 sex-unknown) in addition to chronic SCI (median injury duration 12.3 y, IQR 8.03–14.8). Individuals with tetraplegia had a higher fat percentage (weighted mean difference (WMD) 1.9%, 95% CI 0.6, 3.1) and lower lean mass (WMD −3.0 kg, 95% CI −5.9, −0.2) compared to those with paraplegia. Those with tetraplegia also had higher indicators of central adiposity (WMD, visceral adipose tissue area 0.24 dm2 95% CI 0.05, 0.43 and volume 1.05 L 95% CI 0.14, 1.95), whereas body mass index was lower in individuals with tetraplegia than paraplegia (WMD −0.9 kg/mg2, 95% CI −1.4, −0.5). Sex, age, and injury characteristics were observed to be sources of heterogeneity. Thus, individuals with tetraplegia have higher fat composition compared to paraplegia. Anthropometric measures, such as body mass index, may be inaccurate in describing adiposity in SCI individuals.


2002 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. S73
Author(s):  
W E Langbein ◽  
K J Williams ◽  
S Foley ◽  
E Collins ◽  
S VanDeWalker ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 30 (sup1) ◽  
pp. S97-S104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig M. McDonald ◽  
Allison L. Abresch-Meyer ◽  
Mindy Dopier Nelson ◽  
Lana M. M.Widman

2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 208-215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fiona E. Pelly ◽  
Elizabeth M. Broad ◽  
Natalie Stuart ◽  
Mark A. Holmes

2016 ◽  
Vol 48 ◽  
pp. 1025
Author(s):  
Christina YM Apostolakis ◽  
Hugues Plourde ◽  
Ryan ER Reid ◽  
Shane N. Sweet ◽  
Ross Andersen

1994 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. A208
Author(s):  
William Peruzzi ◽  
Barry Shapiro ◽  
Roy Cane ◽  
Paul Meyer

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 277-281
Author(s):  
Rodrigo Rodrigues Gomes Costa ◽  
Rodrigo Luiz Carregaro ◽  
Frederico Ribeiro Neto

Context:There seems to be no consensus on which aspects better distinguish the different levels of spinal cord injury regarding body composition, strength, and functional independence.Objective:The study aimed to determine which variables better differentiate tetraplegia (TP) from paraplegia and high paraplegia (HP) from low paraplegia (LP).Design:Cross-sectional study.Setting:Rehabilitation hospital network.Patients:Forty-five men with spinal cord injury, n = 15 for each level (TP, HP, and LP) causing complete motor impairment (American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale: A or B) were enrolled in the study.Main Outcome Measures:The 1-maximum repetition test, functional independence measure, spinal cord independence measure, and body composition (skinfold sum, body fat percentage, and body mass index) were assessed. Discriminant analysis was carried out using the Wilks lambda method to identify which strength and functional variables can significantly discriminate subjects for injury classification (TP, HP, and LP).Results:The discriminant variable for TP versus HP was body mass index and for TP versus LP was 1-maximum repetition (P ≤ .05). There were no variables that discriminated HP versus LP.Conclusions:The discriminant variables for TP versus HP and TP versus LP were body mass index and 1-maximum repetition, respectively. The results showed that HP and LP are similar for strength and functional variables.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document