Rehabilitation Tax Credits and Rate of Return on Real Estate under Recent Tax Reform Measures

1987 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 55-61
Author(s):  
Douglas Bible
1987 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 363-372 ◽  
Author(s):  
JAMES R. FOLLAIN ◽  
PATRIC H. HENDERSHOTT ◽  
DAVID C. LING

1985 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 155-168
Author(s):  
Sherman J. Maisel ◽  
John M. Quigley
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Zhenyi Xu ◽  

Since the abolition of the welfare housing distribution policy and the implementation of the monetary reform of the housing system in 1998, there has even been a bubble phenomenon despite the rapid development of the Chinese real estate market. However, considering that the reform of real estate tax will affect the whole system, and there are still various disputes about real estate tax in society, the Chinese government is very slow in real estate tax reform. Given this, under the background that the State Council has been authorized by the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress to pilot real estate tax reform, it is still necessary to explore the legitimacy of China’s real estate tax reform promotion. In general, under the background of solidly promoting common prosperity, resolutely implementing the policy of “housing to live without speculation,” and promoting the stable and healthy development of the real estate market, coupled with the fact that the real estate market has already seen a severe bubble phenomenon. China’s active promotion of real estate tax reform has a solid theoretical and practical basis and has urgency and feasibility.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 2046 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Trouw ◽  
Stephan Weiler ◽  
Jesse Silverstein

This paper shows that brownfield redevelopment occurs at a lower than socially optimal rate due to a stigma effect. A theoretical framework is employed, incorporating asymmetric information showing this stigma within the brownfields market generates a first-mover problem. Developers require a risk premium on their rate of return to offset this stigma, which discourages investment. Asymmetric information further widens the gap between offer and asking prices, reducing successful transactions. Implications of the theoretical framework are explored using a survey of real estate developers in the Denver metropolitan area. Brownfield developers’ typical characteristics along with their risk and stigma premiums are quantified and found to be substantially in excess of cleanup costs.


10.3386/w2289 ◽  
1987 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Follain ◽  
Patric Hendershott ◽  
David Ling

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document