Access policy on English language education at the primary school level in the ASEAN Plus Three member states: motivations, challenges and future directions

2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 197-210
Author(s):  
Subhan Zein
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 438-456
Author(s):  
Halipah Harun ◽  
Muhammad Kamarul Kabilan

This study is to identify errors made by rural primary school pupils in writing and to get information about the causes or sources of errors that lead to pupils’ writing problems. The conceptual framework concerns four types of errors committed by rural primary school pupils in writing, namely tense, spelling, and vocabulary. The study is based on Corder’s (1971) Error Analysis (EA) and Richards’ (1974) Causes or Sources of Errors as its theoretical framework. It was conducted at two rural schools with 44 pupils of Primary 5, aged 11, as the research sample. A written task was taken as the study instrument in order to answer two research questions. This study has revealed that tense is the most frequent error committed by the pupils, followed by punctuation, vocabulary, and spelling. Moreover, the pupils’ errors are caused by both interlingual and intralingual transfer. It is concerned with rural primary school settings in Kerian where the majority of the pupils use the Malay language as their medium of instruction. In addition, this study has its implication for English Language Education in Malaysia, in which it affects rural pupils’ performance especially in Primary School Achievement Test also known as Ujian Pencapaian Sekolah Rendah (UPSR) in English Writing paper. Some adjustments in the education system and the total involvement from education departments are meant to better reduce the number of low performers, especially in English writing to enhance the level of English proficiency in rural schools.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-39
Author(s):  
Nurul Jannah Ahmad Ghulamuddin ◽  
Siti Khadijah Mohd Mohari ◽  
Kamisah Ariffin

Writing is perceived to be one of the most difficult skills for English language learners to master. Although studies on challenges faced by ESL students in writing are replete, most of them have focused on students at secondary and tertiary levels of education. Studies on learners at lower level have been scarce. Thus, this paper aims to fill the gap by examining the major problems faced by ESL primary school level students in writing in English. Survey and interview sessions were conducted to fit the purpose of the study. Data were collected from a class of 26 students from Year/Standard 6 of the primary school level in Malaysia and an interview session with the English teacher of that particular class. The findings indicate that the major difficulties charted are rooted in the students’ poor mastery in vocabulary, inability to spell words correctly and L1 interference. Thus, in order to enhance the students’ skills in writing in English, the teacher implemented some remedial measures during the teaching and learning sessions. The findings have essential pedagogical implications on understanding students’ struggle to write in English at the lower level of education.


English language teaching is a significant part of schools’ curriculum in native and non-native English speaking countries in the world. This study aims to present a review on the similarities and differences of ELTP (English Language Teaching Practice) at primary school level in three Asian countries: Afghanistan, Malaysia and Saudi Arabia. The paper discusses some of the similarities and differences of ELT practice at primary school level in these three Asian countries, based on teaching English as a foreign or second language ESL/EFL, when English as a subject is introduced in school, Policy towards English, religious and cultural perceptions towards English, methods of instruction, teaching aids and teaching materials, and challenges in ELT. The discussion shows that there are quite a few similarities between Afghanistan and Saudi Arabia regarding ELT practice at primary school level while in the case of Malaysia, ELT is more progressive and up to date in terms of policy and implementation. The paper also highlights some of the challenges faced by teachers in the three countries.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document