Reducing poverty and income inequality in Sri Lanka: does trade liberalisation help?

2014 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 629-655 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sumudu Perera ◽  
Mahinda Siriwardana ◽  
Stuart Mounter
2016 ◽  
Vol 59 ◽  
pp. 102-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tilak S. Liyanaarachchi ◽  
Athula Naranpanawa ◽  
Jayatilleke S. Bandara

2018 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 69
Author(s):  
R. A. P. I. S. Dharmadasa ◽  
J. Weerahewa ◽  
P. A. Samarathunga

2018 ◽  
Vol 105 ◽  
pp. 217-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Subhani Keerthiratne ◽  
Richard S.J. Tol

2017 ◽  
Vol 44 (12) ◽  
pp. 1710-1726
Author(s):  
Athula Naranpanawa ◽  
Jayatilleke Bandara

Purpose There is a large body of literature on the link between trade liberalisation, growth and poverty. However, less attention has been paid to the relationship between trade and regional disparities. The purpose of this paper is to identify and quantify the regional impacts of trade liberalisation, particularly in the war-affected regions and to understand to what extent trade reforms can contribute to the post-war recovery process and long-term economic and political stability in Sri Lanka. Design/methodology/approach The authors developed a single country multi-regional computable general equilibrium (CGE) model for the Sri Lankan economy to meet the need for a detailed country study as emphasised in the recent literature. Findings Both short-run and long-run results suggest that all regions including war-affected regions in the country gain from trade liberalisation, although gains are uneven across regions. Furthermore, the results suggest that war-affected regions gain more relative to some other regions in the long run. Originality/value According to the best of the authors’ knowledge within country regional impact of trade liberalisation using a multi-regional CGE model has never been attempted for Sri Lanka. The results of this study, even though based on Sri Lankan data, will be relevant to other developing countries engulfed in internal conflicts with regional economic disparities.


1985 ◽  
Vol 24 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 407-422 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans De Kruijk ◽  
Myrana Van Leeuwen

According to Paul Streeten [101, the relationship between poverty eradication and reducing income inequalities is still an unsettled question. He mentions empirical studies of eleven countries. In ten of these countries, poverty and inequality move in the same direction, both increasing (Brazil, Mexico, Indonesia) or both declining (Korea, Taiwan, Sri Lanka, Costa Rica, Yugoslavia, China and Israel). The only exception is perhaps Kuwait, where poverty (of Kuwaiti citizens, but not of the large group of immigrant workers) has been reduced, while inequality has increased (explanation: oil wealth).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document