Impact of spine surgery on signs and symptoms of spinal deformity

2006 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 318-339 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martha Hawes
Author(s):  
Hari Kalagara ◽  
Harsha Nair ◽  
Sree Kolli ◽  
Gopal Thota ◽  
Vishal Uppal

Abstract Purpose of Review This article describes the anatomy of the spine, relevant ultrasonographic views, and the techniques used to perform the neuraxial blocks using ultrasound imaging. Finally, we review the available evidence for the use of ultrasound imaging to perform neuraxial blocks. Recent Findings Central neuraxial blockade using traditional landmark palpation is a reliable technique to provide surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. However, factors like obesity, spinal deformity, and previous spine surgery can make the procedure challenging. The use of ultrasound imaging has been shown to assist in these scenarios. Summary Preprocedural imaging minimizes the technical difficulty of spinal and epidural placement with fewer needle passes and skin punctures. It helps to accurately identify the midline, vertebral level, interlaminar space, and can predict the depth to the epidural and intrathecal spaces. By providing information about the best angle and direction of approach, in addition to the depth, ultrasound imaging allows planning an ideal trajectory for a successful block. These benefits are most noticeable when expert operators carry out the ultrasound examination and for patients with predicted difficult spinal anatomy. Recent evidence suggests that pre-procedural neuraxial ultrasound imaging may reduce complications such as vascular puncture, headache, and backache. Neuraxial ultrasound imaging should be in the skill set of every anesthesiologist who routinely performs lumbar or thoracic neuraxial blockade. We recommend using preprocedural neuraxial imaging routinely to acquire and maintain the imaging skills to enable success for challenging neuraxial procedures.


2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 180-187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitsuru Yagi ◽  
Naobumi Hosogane ◽  
Nobuyuki Fujita ◽  
Eijiro Okada ◽  
Osahiko Tsuji ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitsuru Yagi ◽  
Hideaki Ohne ◽  
Shinjiro Kaneko ◽  
Masafumi Machida ◽  
Yoshiyuki Yato ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Jeremy Fairbank ◽  
Nuno Batista

Spine surgery addresses pain, loss of function and deformity of the spine. Earlier conceptions of chronic pain have changed, but there is still a limited role for surgery to manage painful spinal pathology. Loss of function is caused by tumours, fractures and infections, all of which can be helped by surgery. Deformity is called scoliosis and/or kyphosis, and be corrected by surgery. Spinal deformity is increasingly recognized in adults as an important cause of disability, especially when there is loss of sagittal balance. Advances in anaesthesia and implant technology have allowed the spine surgeon greater opportunities to help seriously disabled patients in ways not possible 20 years ago. Fractures occur following trauma, but are also associated with impaired bone strength, particularly through osteoporosis.


Neurospine ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 447-454
Author(s):  
Sung Hyun Noh ◽  
Kyung Hyun Kim ◽  
Jeong Yoon Park ◽  
Sung Uk Kuh ◽  
Keun Su Kim ◽  
...  

Objective: The aim of study is to investigate the features and risk factors of rod fracture (RF) following adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery.Methods: We searched the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases to identify relevant studies. Patient’s data including age, sex, body mass index (BMI), previous spine surgery, pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO), interbody fusion, fusion to the pelvis, smoking history, preoperative sagittal vertical axis (SVA), preoperative pelvic tilt (PT), preoperative pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis, preoperative thoracic kyphosis (TK), and change in the SVA were documented. Comparable factors were evaluated using odds ratio (OR) and weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI).Results: Seven studies were included. The overall incidence of RF following ASD surgery was 12%. Advanced age (WMD, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.01–4.59; p < 0.002), higher BMI (WMD, 1.98; 95% CI, 0.65–3.31; p = 0.004), previous spine surgery (OR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.05–2.04; p = 0.02), PSO (OR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.62–3.19; p < 0.0001), a larger preoperative PT (WMD, 6.17; 95% CI, 3.55–8.97; p < 0.00001), and a larger preoperative TK (WMD, 5.19; 95% CI, 1.41–8.98; p = 0.007) were identified as risk factors for incidence of RF.Conclusion: The incidence of RF in patients following ASD surgery was 12%. Advanced age, higher BMI, previous spine surgery, and PSO were significantly associated with an increased occurrence of RF. A larger preoperative PT and TK were also identified as risk factors for occurrence of RF following ASD surgery.


Author(s):  
Jeremy Fairbank ◽  
Nuno Batista

Spine surgery addresses pain, loss of function and deformity of the spine. Earlier conceptions of chronic pain have changed, but there is still a limited role for surgery to manage painful spinal pathology. Loss of function is caused by tumours, fractures and infections, all of which can be helped by surgery. Deformity is called scoliosis and/or kyphosis, and be corrected by surgery. Spinal deformity is increasingly recognized in adults as an important cause of disability, especially when there is loss of sagittal balance. Advances in anaesthesia and implant technology have allowed the spine surgeon greater opportunities to help seriously disabled patients in ways not possible 20 years ago. Fractures occur following trauma, but are also associated with impaired bone strength, particularly through osteoporosis.


2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (10) ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Anand H. Segar ◽  
Wesley H. Bronson ◽  
Barret Boody ◽  
Glenn Russo ◽  
Sidhant Gugale ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (9) ◽  
pp. 453-461
Author(s):  
Bram P. Verhofste ◽  
Michael P. Glotzbecker ◽  
David S. Marks ◽  
Craig M. Birch ◽  
Anna M. McClung ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document