A review of “Failure to thrive in young children-research and practice evaluated”

2000 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 101-102
Author(s):  
Jane A. Batchelor
2021 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-30
Author(s):  
Xigrid T. Soto-Boykin ◽  
Anne L. Larson ◽  
Arnold Olszewski ◽  
Veena Velury ◽  
Anna Feldberg

Young children with and without disabilities who are bilingual or in the process of learning multiple languages have many strengths; however, educational policies and bias related to bilingualism for children from linguistically minoritized groups have typically included deficit-based views. The purpose of this systematic review was to identify how researchers describe these children and their caregivers. Thirty research studies were included in the review. Each study was published in Infants and Young Children, Journal of Early Intervention, or Topics in Early Childhood Special Education between 1988 and 2020. Studies were coded to determine participant characteristics and whether deficit- or strength-based descriptions of participants were used. Although researchers’ descriptions of participants’ linguistic backgrounds varied, most were English-centric, and deficit-based descriptions of bilingualism were more prevalent than strength-based descriptions. Preliminary recommendations are provided for describing children and families from linguistically minoritized communities and including strength-based language in research and practice.


2000 ◽  
Vol 136 (3) ◽  
pp. 345-350 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy A. Sentongo ◽  
Andrew M. Tershakovec ◽  
Maria R. Mascarenhas ◽  
Miriam H. Watson ◽  
Virginia A. Stallings

1980 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dennis Drotar ◽  
Charles Malone ◽  
Judy Negray

2020 ◽  
pp. 027112142095185
Author(s):  
Jeevita Sidhu ◽  
Natasha Barlas ◽  
Karin Lifter

The term functional play is used widely and variably in serving young children developing with delays, affecting its use in research and practice. It also is confused with play as a functional goal. We reviewed studies that used the term. Of 146 reports, less than half included a definition. We organized those with definitions into two groups: one in terms of appropriate use of toys and the other in terms of motor activities. We conclude that the toy-directed focus subsumed in appropriate use is subject to wide variation in interpretation, and it should not be used as a category of play. It does not explicitly take into account children’s developmental progress in play. We recommend the term should be reserved for activities that support engagement and interest. Such activities represent play as functional for a child, requiring an understanding of children’s progress in play, which is play that is child-focused.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document