Story stem narratives with young children: Moving to clinical research and practice

2007 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 179-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joann L. Robinson
Keyword(s):  
Young Children ◽  
Clinical Research ◽  
Research And Practice

scholarly journals Who Is Centered? A Systematic Review of Early Childhood Researchers’ Descriptions of Children and Caregivers From Linguistically Minoritized Communities

2021 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-30
Author(s):  
Xigrid T. Soto-Boykin ◽  
Anne L. Larson ◽  
Arnold Olszewski ◽  
Veena Velury ◽  
Anna Feldberg
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Early Childhood ◽  
Young Children ◽  
Early Childhood Special Education ◽  
Children And Families ◽  
Research And Practice ◽  
Strength Based ◽  
Multiple Languages ◽  
Linguistic Backgrounds ◽  
Infants And Young Children

Young children with and without disabilities who are bilingual or in the process of learning multiple languages have many strengths; however, educational policies and bias related to bilingualism for children from linguistically minoritized groups have typically included deficit-based views. The purpose of this systematic review was to identify how researchers describe these children and their caregivers. Thirty research studies were included in the review. Each study was published in Infants and Young Children, Journal of Early Intervention, or Topics in Early Childhood Special Education between 1988 and 2020. Studies were coded to determine participant characteristics and whether deficit- or strength-based descriptions of participants were used. Although researchers’ descriptions of participants’ linguistic backgrounds varied, most were English-centric, and deficit-based descriptions of bilingualism were more prevalent than strength-based descriptions. Preliminary recommendations are provided for describing children and families from linguistically minoritized communities and including strength-based language in research and practice.

scholarly journals Reflections on the TEAM Trial: Why Clinical Care and Research Should be Reconciled

2011 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 198-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean Raymond
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Research ◽  
Intracranial Aneurysms ◽  
Potential Benefit ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Major Change ◽  
Management Team ◽  
Endovascular Management ◽  
Public Agencies ◽  
Research And Practice ◽  
Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms

The current clinical and research environment is one that renders any true enquiry into the value of commonly performed surgical acts practically impossible. Drawing from the recent failure of Trial on Endovascular Aneurysm Management (TEAM), a trial on the endovascular management of unruptured intracranial aneurysms, I attempt to identify some principles that sustain the current ways of doing clinical research that have paradoxically become major obstacles to trials that aim to assess the potential benefit or harm due to interventions as currently practiced. Clinical research and practice must coalesce into “clinical care trials” if we are to provide patients with optimal, prudent care in the context of uncertainty. This may require a major change in the mentalities of clinicians, scientists, and patients alike, and the adoption of novel strategies for public agencies to support the integration of clinical research and care.

scholarly journals Supervised transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) at home: A guide for clinical research and practice

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 686-693 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leigh E. Charvet ◽  
Michael T. Shaw ◽  
Marom Bikson ◽  
Adam J. Woods ◽  
Helena Knotkova
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Research ◽  
Direct Current ◽  
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation ◽  
Research And Practice ◽  
Direct Current Stimulation ◽  
At Home

scholarly journals Applications of oscillometry in clinical research and practice

2019 ◽  
pp. 1-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lennart K. A. Lundblad ◽  
Salman Siddiqui ◽  
Ynuk Bossé ◽  
Ronald J. Dandurand
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Research ◽  
Research And Practice
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document