Effectiveness of a year-long individual cognitive stimulation program in Portuguese older adults with cognitive impairment

Author(s):  
Susana I. Justo-Henriques ◽  
Enrique Pérez-Sáez ◽  
Ana E. Marques-Castro ◽  
Janessa O. Carvalho
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosa Silva ◽  
Elzbieta Bobrowicz-Campos ◽  
Paulo Santos-Costa ◽  
Ana Rita Cruz ◽  
João Apóstolo

Objective: This study aims to assess the feasibility and meaningfulness of a home-based individual cognitive stimulation (iCS) program delivered by caregivers to persons with cognitive impairment (PwCIs). It also aims to assess whether the older adults receiving this program improved their cognitive, neuropsychiatric, and depressive symptoms and quality of life and whether their caregivers improved their mental and physical health.Methods: A randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted with PwCI-caregiver dyads recruited from the community. Participants were allocated to two groups: intervention (n = 28) and control (n = 24). The intervention group received the European Portuguese version of the Individual Cognitive Stimulation Program—Making a Difference 3 (MD3-P). The control group received usual care. The iCS therapy program was implemented three times a week for 12 weeks. Caregivers were supported by the researchers to deliver the sessions at home. Participants were assessed at baseline and at the end of the intervention (week 13). Feasibility and meaningfulness were assessed through the attrition rate, adherence, and degree of satisfaction with the sessions. Four interviews were conducted (after week 13) to understand participants’ experiences.Results: The attrition rate was 23.1%. The dyads reported that they did not have high expectations about the iCS program before starting the study. Nevertheless, as the program evolved, caregivers noted that their family members had improved some areas of functioning. Intention-to-treat analysis based on group differences revealed a significant improvement in PwCIs’ cognition, specifically in their orientation and ability to follow commands. The intervention had no impact on other variables such as caregivers’ physical and mental health.Conclusion: The iCS program implemented by caregivers showed promising results in improving PwCIs’ cognition. The participants who completed the intervention attributed a positive meaning to the MD3-P, confirming it as a valid non-pharmacological therapeutic approach to reducing frailty in PwCIs in community settings.Clinical Trial Registration:www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier [NCT03514095].


2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 503-512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge Alves ◽  
Filipa Alves-Costa ◽  
Rosana Magalhães ◽  
Óscar F. Gonçalves ◽  
Adriana Sampaio

2017 ◽  
Vol Volume 12 ◽  
pp. 1967-1975 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leila Djabelkhir ◽  
Ya-Huei Wu ◽  
Jean-Sébastien Vidal ◽  
Victoria Cristancho-Lacroix ◽  
Fabienne Marlats ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Isabel Gómez-Soria ◽  
Natalia Brandín-de la Cruz ◽  
Juan Nicolás Cuenca Zaldívar ◽  
Sandra Calvo ◽  
Pablo Herrero ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanna Malmberg Gavelin ◽  
Amit Lampit ◽  
Harry Hallock ◽  
Julieta Sabates ◽  
Alex Bahar-Fuchs

Cognition-oriented treatments (COTs) – commonly categorized as cognitive training, cognitive rehabilitation and cognitive stimulation – are promising approaches for the prevention of cognitive and functional decline in older adults. We conducted a systematic overview of meta-analyses investigating the efficacy of COTs on cognitive and non-cognitive outcomes in older adults with or without cognitive impairment. Review quality was assessed by AMSTAR 2. We identified 51 eligible reviews, 46 of which were included in the quantitative synthesis. The confidence ratings were “moderate” for 9 (20%), “low” for 13 (28%) and “critically low” for 24 (52%) of the 46 reviews. While most reviews provided pooled effect estimates for objective cognition, non-cognitive outcomes of potential relevance were more sparsely reported. The mean effect estimate on cognition was small for cognitive training in healthy older adults (Hedge’s g 0.32, range 0.13-0.64, 19 reviews), mild cognitive impairment (Hedge’s g 0.40, range 0.32-0.60, five reviews), and dementia (Hedge’s g 0.38, range 0.09-1.16, seven reviews), and small for cognitive stimulation in dementia (Hedge’s g 0.36, range 0.26-0.44, five reviews). Meta-regression revealed that higher AMSTAR score was associated with larger effect estimates for cognitive outcomes. The available evidence supports the efficacy of COTs improving cognitive performance in older adults. The extent to which such effects are of clinical value remains unclear, due to the scarcity of high-quality evidence and heterogeneity in reported findings. An important avenue for future trials is to include relevant non-cognitive outcomes in a more consistent way and, for meta-analyses in the field, there is a need for better adherence to methodological standards.PROSPERO registration number: CRD42018084490.Gavelin, H.M., Lampit, A., Hallock, H. et al. Cognition-Oriented Treatments for Older Adults: a Systematic Overview of Systematic Reviews. Neuropsychol Rev (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-020-09434-8


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leslie María Contreras-Somoza ◽  
Eider Irazoki ◽  
José Miguel Toribio-Guzmán ◽  
Isabel de la Torre-Díez ◽  
Angie Alejandra Diaz-Baquero ◽  
...  

IntroductionIncorporating technology in cognitive interventions represents an innovation, making them more accessible, flexible, and cost-effective. This will not be feasible without adequate user-technology fit. Bearing in mind the importance of developing cognitive interventions whose technology is appropriate for elderly people with cognitive impairment, the objective of this systematic review was to find evidence about usability and user experience (UX) measurements and features of stimulation, training, and cognitive rehabilitation technologies for older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia.MethodThe Medline, PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and PsycINFO databases were searched for literature published in the last 10 years (2009–2019), and three researchers independently reviewed potentially eligible studies, following specific inclusion criteria. A systematic review of the studies was conducted, presenting a qualitative synthesis of usability and UX measures with their outcomes, study characteristics and features of the cognitive intervention technologies.ResultsTen studies were selected: five were cognitive stimulation and five were cognitive training. Most of them (60%) were computer-based programs with a serious game format. Efficiency and effectiveness were the most frequent measurements used for collecting objective usability data, showing that elderly people with cognitive impairment require more time (45%) and help (40%) but can complete tasks (60%). Regarding UX or subjective usability data, questionnaires and scales were the most used methods, reporting positive experience despite certain difficulties with the interface in five studies.ConclusionMeasuring usability and UX in cognitive intervention technologies for older adults with MCI or dementia provides an integrated view that can contribute to their development according to the needs and characteristics of the target population. More research is required to include this population group in usability and UX studies, as well as standardized tools and consensus on the relationship of these terms to guarantee the future effectiveness of cognitive intervention technologies.Review registrationThis review was registered in the PROSPERO (CRD42020158147) International Register of Systematic Review Protocols.


Author(s):  
Jessica Marian Goodman-Casanova ◽  
Elena Dura-Perez ◽  
Jose Guzman-Parra ◽  
Antonio Cuesta-Vargas ◽  
Fermin Mayoral-Cleries

BACKGROUND The public health emergency of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is rapidly evolving worldwide; some countries, including Spain, have implemented restrictive measures. Populations that are vulnerable to this outbreak and its physical and mental health effects include community-dwelling older adults with mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia. Telehealth is a potential tool to deliver health care and decrease exposure risk. OBJECTIVE The aims of this study were to explore the impact of confinement on the health and well-being of community-dwelling older adults with mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia, to provide television-based and telephone-based health and social support, and to study the effects of a television-based assistive integrated technology, TV-AssistDem (TeleVision-based ASSistive Integrated Service to supporT European adults living with mild DEMentia or mild cognitive impairment). METHODS A telephone-based survey was administered in Spain to 93 participants in the TV-AssistDem clinical trial from March 25 to April 6, 2020. RESULTS Of the respondents, 60/93 (65%) were women. The mean age was 73.34 (SD 6.07), and 69/93 (74%) lived accompanied. Lockdown measures forced 17/93 respondents (18%) to change their living arrangements. Health status was found to be optimal in 89/93 respondents (96%), with no COVID-19 symptoms. Grocery and pharmacy outings were performed by family members of 68/93 participants (73%); 57 (61%) reported overall well-being, and 65 (70%) maintained their sleep quality. However, participants living alone reported greater negative feelings and more sleeping problems. Regarding leisure activities, 53/93 respondents (57%) took walks, 32 (35%) played memory games, 55 (60%) watched television, and 91 (98%) telephoned relatives. 58/93 (64%) respondents reported accessing moderate or too much COVID-19 information, 89 (97%) received it from television, and 56 (62%) stated that their understanding of the information was extreme. 39/93 (39%) respondents had contacted health and social services, while 29 (31%) requested information regarding these services during the telephone call. There were no significant differences in health and well-being between the intervention and control groups. Respondents with TV-AssistDem performed more memory exercises (24/93, 52% vs 8/93, 17.4%; <i>P</i>&lt;.001) than control respondents. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that during COVID-19 confinement, the physical and mental health and well-being was optimal for the majority of our vulnerable population. However, those living alone reported greater negative psychological effects and sleeping problems. Measures adopted to address the negative experiences of confinement included keeping informed about the situation, accessing health and social services, having a support network that prevents risk of exposure to COVID-19 and guarantees food and medical supplies, a daily routine with maintained sleeping habits and leisure activities, staying physically and mentally active with cognitive stimulation exercises, and ensuring social connectedness using technology. Television sets were preferred technological devices to access COVID-19 information, watch television as a recreational activity, and perform memory exercises as an intellectual activity. Television-based telehealth support using TV-AssistDem demonstrated potential for cognitive stimulation. CLINICALTRIAL ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03653234; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03653234


2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pablo Cruz Gonzalez ◽  
Kenneth N. K. Fong ◽  
Ted Brown

Objective. The aim of this pilot study was to investigate whether the use of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex could boost the effects of a cognitive stimulation (CS) programme using a tablet on five older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI).Method.A single-subject study of A-B-C-A design was used. After the baseline with the administration of CS (phase A), a sham treatment with CS was applied (B). Following the withdrawal of sham treatment, tDCS was introduced in combination with CS (C). Finally, phase A was replicated a second time.Results.tDCS had a significant effect on processing speed, selective attention, and planning ability tasks in terms of performance and completion time.Conclusion.tDCS appears to have a positive impact on some cognitive components in CS in persons with MCI. Further study on its long-term effects and generalization of power to daily activities is warranted.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document