“I Don't Know What You're Looking for”: Professional Vision in Swedish Agricultural Extension on Nature Conservation Management

2008 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 329-345 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.L. Bergeå ◽  
C. Martin ◽  
F. Sahlström
2016 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 291-297
Author(s):  
Tünde Szmatona-Túri ◽  
Diána Vona-Túri

Our investigation targeted the diversity of spider communities of meadows under nature conservation management and the relationship between mowing and the spider diversity. The study sites represented by six grasslands on three localities of Mátra mountain of Hungary. All three localities were contained a hay meadow and a not mowed meadow. Hay meadows had the richest spider communities.  In the control habitats, the equitability and the Shannon-Wiener diversity were lower than in the mowed grasslands. According to the Bray-Curtis similarity index significant differences were observed between spider assemblages of mowed and control habitats. The prevention of succession effects so rich structure of the vegetation where diverse spider communities can live. Our results suggest that mowing is a suitable management for maintaining a high biodiversity in mountain grasslands.


2005 ◽  
Vol 2005 ◽  
pp. 64-64
Author(s):  
R. W. Small

Developments in UK agriculture and nature conservation provide promising prospects for native breeds of farm livestock, and hence for the conservation of their genetic resource, but only if certain difficulties can be overcome. This analysis explores the opportunities provided by those developments, the strengths and weaknesses of the use of native breeds in conservation management, and threats posed to native breeds by extraneous factors.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Cervellini ◽  
Piero Zannini ◽  
Michele Di Musciano ◽  
Simone Fattorini ◽  
Borja Jiménez-Alfaro ◽  
...  

Biogeographical units are widely adopted in ecological research and nature conservation management, even though biogeographical regionalisation is still under scientific debate. The European Environment Agency provided an official map of the European Biogeographical Regions (EBRs), which contains the official boundaries used in the Habitats and Birds Directives. However, these boundaries bisect cells in the official EU 10 km × 10 km grid used for many purposes, including reporting species and habitat data, meaning that 6881 cells overlap two or more regions. Therefore, superimposing the EBRs vector map over the grid creates ambiguities in associating some cells with European Biogeographical Regions. To provide an operational tool to unambiguously define the boundaries of the eleven European Biogeographical Regions, we provide a specifically developed raster map of Grid-Based European Biogeographical Regions (GB-EBRs). In this new map, the borders of the EBRs are reshaped to coherently match the standard European 10 km × 10 km grid imposed for reporting tasks by Article 17 of the Habitats Directive and used for many other datasets. We assign each cell to the EBR with the largest area within the cell.


Author(s):  
T Galanina ◽  
T Koroleva ◽  
M Baumgarten ◽  
E Kucherova ◽  
M Korolev

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 96-107
Author(s):  
Örjan Grönlund ◽  
Emanuel Erlandsson ◽  
Line Djupström ◽  
Dan Bergström ◽  
Lars Eliasson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document