Sex education and cultural values: experiences and attitudes of Latina immigrant women

Sex Education ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 545-554 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Elena Villar ◽  
Maritza Concha
2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle Easter ◽  
Susan Shaw ◽  
Ema Barbosa ◽  
Margaret E. Bentley

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katelyn E. Anderson ◽  
Melissa R. Donovick ◽  
Elisa C. Devargas ◽  
Yolanda Valenzuela

2006 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melanie R. Wasserman ◽  
Deborah E. Bender ◽  
Shoou-Yih Lee ◽  
Joseph P. Morrissey ◽  
Ted Mouw ◽  
...  

Labour ◽  
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincenzo Scoppa ◽  
Manuela Stranges

1999 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 200-212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cynthia A. Gómez ◽  
Mónica Hernández ◽  
Bonnie Faigeles

In 1996, nearly 60% of U.S. AIDS cases among Latinas were attributed to unprotected sex with men. Economic disadvantage, language barriers, and strong cultural gender norms regarding sex exacerbate the risk for HIV infection among Latina immigrant women. Through a collaboration among scientists and providers, this study was designed to evaluate the impact of a multifaceted empowerment program for Latina immigrant women on HIV risk behaviors. Women ( N = 74) were followed for the first 6 months of their participation and attended up to nine distinct types of activities (e.g., information meetings, friendship circles, and workshops). Although the program was not developed to specifically target HIV risk behaviors, women showed significant increases in sexual communication comfort, were less likely to maintain traditional sexual gender norms, and reported changes in decision-making power. Targeting broader sociocultural issues may increase the necessary skills for Latina women to prevent HIV infection from their sexual partners. Successful collaborations between scientists and providers are critical in developing effective, community-relevant interventions.


Author(s):  
Maura Toro-Morn

This chapter examines the labor disruptions faced by low-wage undocumented Latina immigrant women under the current neoliberal regime by telling the story of Elvira Arellano, a Mexican immigrant who followed the migrant trail of low-wage work in the United States. On August 15, 2007, Arellano traveled to Los Angeles to attend an immigration rally; four days later, she was apprehended by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and deported to Tijuana, Mexico. Arellano's case highlights the criminalization of undocumented immigrants in the the aftermath of 9/11 that has led to a dramatic increase in the number of Latinos sentenced to prison terms in U.S. federal courts. This chapter explores how neoliberal globalization processes in both Mexico and the United States have shaped Arellano's life choices, her agency, and politicization as an undocumented immigrant woman.


Author(s):  
Andie Rexdiemer

A critical case approach is taken to address religious opposition to recent changes in curriculum regarding sex education in Ontario public schools. This includes consideration of the influence of the Christian "purity movement" that is popularized in some parts of North American culture. In a recent Ontario study of parents of elementary and secondary students, 95% of parents agreed that some level of sexual health education should be provided in schools. A separate 2016 poll showed that 82% of parents self-identifying with "no religion" supported the revisions, as did 61% of Catholic parents, 55% of Protestant parents, and 20% of Pentecostal Christians. One in six Ontario parents considered pulling their children from public school over the new sex-ed curriculum, in favour of homeschooling their children or placing them in private Catholic schools. Of the parents who did remove their children from sex education, the majority did so for religious reasons. And yet, evidence suggests that depriving children of sexual health information as a result of the religious identity of a child’s family is a form of unlawful discrimination that may result in physical, sexual, and/or psychological harm to the child. This paper submits that the option for parents to be able to remove their children from sex-education lessons in schools due to a conflict with their religious and cultural values violates children’s human rights in accordance with international law as per the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child.  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document