Modern Company and Capital Market Problems: Improving European Corporate Governance After Enron

2003 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 221-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
Klaus J Hopt
2021 ◽  
Vol 66 (1) ◽  
pp. 140-149
Author(s):  
Eric A. Posner

Empirical findings that common ownership is associated with anticompetitive outcomes including higher prices raise questions about possible policy responses. This comment evaluates the major proposals, including antitrust enforcement against common owners, regulation of corporate governance, regulation of compensation of management of portfolio firms, regulation of capital market structure, and greater antitrust enforcement against portfolio firms.


2010 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 222-225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huson Joher Ali Ahmed

This study aims at re-examining whether or not the structure of the corporate governance as defined by the non-executive director matter that lead to better performance. This study is based on 100 firms listed in first board. The analysis is based on a period of 5 years from 1999 through 2003. This study employs a multiple regression methods to examine governance structure and its impact on firm performance. Although previous studies in developed markets exhibit the existence of relations between governance structure and corporate performance, this study however concludes that there is partial relation between corporate governance structure and corporate performance. However, the presence of both audit and remuneration committee serves an important monitoring device to control management actives that lead to increase firm’s performance.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document