scholarly journals Incorporating health inequality impact into economic evaluation in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fan Yang ◽  
Kenneth Roger Katumba ◽  
Susan Griffin
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Economic Evaluation ◽  
Health Inequality ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Low And Middle Income

scholarly journals Examining the use of economic evaluations in health-related humanitarian programmes in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 210-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lizna A Makhani ◽  
Valerie Moran ◽  
Zia Sadique ◽  
Neha S Singh ◽  
Paul Revill ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Economic Evaluation ◽  
Bibliographic Databases ◽  
Economic Evaluations ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
System Perspective ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Humanitarian Crises ◽  
Health Related ◽  
Low And Middle Income

Abstract The costly nature of health sector responses to humanitarian crises and resource constraints means that there is a need to identify methods for priority setting and long-term planning. One method is economic evaluation. The aim of this systematic review is to examine the use of economic evaluations in health-related humanitarian programmes in low- and middle-income countries. This review used peer-reviewed literature published between January 1980 and June 2018 extracted from four main electronic bibliographic databases. The eligibility criteria were full economic evaluations (which compare the costs and outcomes of at least two interventions and provide information on efficiency) of health-related services in humanitarian crises in low- and middle-countries. The quality of eligible studies is appraised using the modified 36-question Drummond checklist. From a total of 8127 total studies, 11 full economic evaluations were identified. All economic evaluations were cost-effectiveness analyses. Three of the 11 studies used a provider perspective, 2 studies used a healthcare system perspective, 3 studies used a societal perspective and 3 studies did not specify the perspective used. The lower quality studies failed to provide 7information on the unit of costs and did not justify the time horizon of costs and discount rates, or conduct a sensitivity analysis. There was limited geographic range of the studies, with 9 of the 11 studies conducted in Africa. Recommendations include greater use of economic evaluation methods and data to enhance the microeconomic understanding of health interventions in humanitarian settings to support greater efficiency and transparency and to strengthen capacity by recruiting economists and providing training in economic methods to humanitarian agencies.

scholarly journals Economic Evaluation of Family Planning Interventions in Low and Middle Income Countries; A Systematic Review

PLoS ONE ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. e0168447 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neily Zakiyah ◽  
Antoinette D. I. van Asselt ◽  
Frank Roijmans ◽  
Maarten J. Postma
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Economic Evaluation ◽  
Family Planning ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Low And Middle Income

scholarly journals Economic evaluation guidelines in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review

2021 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline Daccache ◽  
Rana Rizk ◽  
Jalal Dahham ◽  
Silvia M. A. A. Evers ◽  
Mickael Hiligsmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Economic Evaluation ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Impact Analysis ◽  
Low Income Countries ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Similarities And Differences ◽  
Low And Middle Income

Abstract Objectives To systematically identify the latest versions of official economic evaluation guidelines (EEGs) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and explore similarities and differences in their content. Methods We conducted a systematic search in MEDLINE (Ovid), PubMed, EconLit, Embase (Ovid), the Cochrane Library, and the gray literature. Using a predefined checklist, we extracted the key features of economic evaluation and the general characteristics of EEGs. We conducted a comparative analysis, including a summary of similarities and differences across EEGs. Results Thirteen EEGs were identified, three pertaining to lower-middle-income countries (Bhutan, Egypt, and Indonesia), nine to upper-middle-income countries (Brazil, China, Colombia, Cuba, Malaysia, Mexico, Russian Federation, South Africa, and Thailand), in addition to Mercosur, and none to low-income countries. The majority (n = 12) considered cost–utility analysis and health-related quality-of-life outcome. Half of the EEGs recommended the societal perspective, whereas the other half recommended the healthcare perspective. Equity considerations were required in ten EEGs. Most EEGs (n = 11) required the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio and recommended sensitivity analysis, as well as the presentation of a budget impact analysis (n = 10). Seven of the identified EEGs were mandatory for pharmacoeconomics submission. Methodological gaps, contradictions, and heterogeneity in terminologies used were identified within the guidelines. Conclusion As the importance of health technology assessment is increasing in LMICs, this systematic review could help researchers explore key aspects of existing EEGs in LMICs and explore differences among them. It could also support international organizations in guiding LMICs to develop their own EEGs and improve the methodological framework of existing ones.

The Economic Cost of Violence Against Women and Girls in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review of the Evidence

2021 ◽  
pp. 152483802110160
Author(s):  
Seema Vyas ◽  
Melissa Meinhart ◽  
Katrina Troy ◽  
Hannah Brumbaum ◽  
Catherine Poulton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Violence Against Women ◽  
Economic Burden ◽  
Data Availability ◽  
Female Genital Cutting ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Women And Girls ◽  
Low And Middle Income

Evidence demonstrating the economic burden of violence against women and girls can support policy and advocacy efforts for investment in violence prevention and response programming. We undertook a systematic review of evidence on the costs of violence against women and girls in low- and middle-income countries published since 2005. In addition to understanding costs, we examined the consistency of methodological approaches applied and identified and assessed common methodological issues. Thirteen articles were identified, eight of which were from sub-Saharan Africa. Eight studies estimated costs associated with domestic or intimate partner violence, others estimated the costs of interpersonal violence, female genital cutting, and sexual assaults. Methodologies applied to estimate costs were typically based on accounting approaches. Our review found that out-of-pocket expenditures to individuals for seeking health care after an episode of violence ranged from US$29.72 (South Africa) to US$156.11 (Romania) and that lost productivity averaged from US$73.84 to US$2,151.48 (South Africa) per facility visit. Most studies that estimated provider costs of service delivery presented total programmatic costs, and there was variation in interventions, scale, and resource inputs measured which hampered comparability. Variations in methodological assumptions and data availability also made comparisons across countries and settings challenging. The limited scope of studies in measuring the multifaceted impacts of violence highlights the challenges in identifying cost metrics that extend beyond specific violence episodes. Despite the limited evidence base, our assessment leads us to conclude that the estimated costs of violence against women and girls are a fraction of its true economic burden.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document