Locking intramedullary nails versus locking plates for the treatment of proximal humerus fractures

2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (9) ◽  
pp. 733-739 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mauro E.C. Gracitelli ◽  
Eduardo A. Malavolta ◽  
Jorge H. Assunção ◽  
Arnaldo A. Ferreira Neto ◽  
Jorge S. Silva ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 215145851775051 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam Schumaier ◽  
Brian Grawe

Introduction: Proximal humerus fractures are common in the elderly. The evaluation and management of these injuries is often controversial. The purpose of this study is to review recent evidence and provide updated recommendations for treating proximal humerus fractures in the elderly. Methods: A literature review of peer-reviewed publications related to the evaluation and management of proximal humerus fractures in the elderly was performed. There was a focus on randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews published within the last 5 years. Results: The incidence of proximal humerus fractures is increasing. It is a common osteoporotic fracture. Bone density is a predictor of reduction quality and can be readily assessed with anteroposterior views of the shoulder. Social independence is a predictor of outcome, whereas age is not. Many fractures are minimally displaced and respond acceptably to nonoperative management. Displaced and severe fractures are most frequently treated operatively with intramedullary nails, locking plates, percutaneous techniques, or arthroplasty. Discussion: Evidence from randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews is insufficient to recommend a treatment; however, most techniques have acceptable or good outcomes. Evaluation should include an assessment of the patient’s bone quality, social independence, and surgical risk factors. With internal fixation, special attention should be paid to medial comminution, varus angulation, and restoration of the calcar. With arthroplasty, attention should be paid to anatomic restoration of the tuberosities and proper placement of the prosthesis. Conclusion: A majority of minimally displaced fractures can be treated conservatively with early physical therapy. Treatment for displaced fractures should consider the patient’s level of independence, bone quality, and surgical risk factors. Fixation with percutaneous techniques, intramedullary nails, locking plates, and arthroplasty are all acceptable treatment options. There is no clear evidence-based treatment of choice, and the surgeon should consider their comfort level with various procedures during the decision-making process.


2009 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 837-844 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christos Thanasas ◽  
George Kontakis ◽  
Antonios Angoules ◽  
David Limb ◽  
Peter Giannoudis

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (2.7) ◽  
pp. 889-892
Author(s):  
Dr. S Makesh Ram ◽  
Dr. M Antony Vimal Raj ◽  
Dr. G Mohan ◽  
Dr. Anand ◽  
Dr. M Rathna Kumar ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (42) ◽  
pp. 2086-2089
Author(s):  
Lokesh Holagundi ◽  
Hemanth H.P ◽  
Dayanand M ◽  
Deepak Shivanna ◽  
Vishwas Hosur Ravishankar

Author(s):  
Emer Feerick ◽  
Jim Kennedy ◽  
Hannan Mullet ◽  
Patrick McGarry ◽  
David FitzPatrick

Complex three part proximal humerus fractures in osteoporotic patients are a particularly challenging injury to manage as the associated bone loss reduces the efficacy of standard fixation techniques. Locking plates are commonly used for three part fracture fixation. However, a clinical study conducted by Owsley et al [1] reports complications with 57% of patients over 60 years of age. In cases of severe bone loss an intramedullary (IM) bone graft implant can be used in conjunction with locking plates to improve fixation and to provide structural stability. The limited and variable availability of bone grafts mean high cost and variable material properties.


Author(s):  
Niranjan D. Tadvi ◽  
Rajesh N. Deveshawar ◽  
Yogesh C. Patel

<p><strong>Background: </strong>Proximal humerus fractures are the most common upper extremity fractures in older patients. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the functional outcome and complications of proximal humeral locking plate used for healing proximal humerus fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study was conducted at the department of Orthopaedics, Sir T. Hospital, Bhavnagar, from June 2008 to March 2010, with 20 patients who suffered with complex proximal humerus fractures and underwent surgical treatment with proximal humerus locking plates. Functional outcome was assessed at the final follow up by using Constant Murley score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the patients was 52 years. Male: female ratio was 1.5: 2. The most common mode if injury is low velocity trauma i.e. fall while walking or fall in bathroom seen in 13 patients. Average time for clinical union was 60 days, while average time for radiological union is 90 days taken in the study. Postoperative complications were seen in 2 patients. Delayed complications were seen in 10 cases. No patients had shown implant related complications. At the final follow up according to Constant Murley score, 36% patients had shown excellent results, 53% patients had shown good results and poor results were seen in 11% of cases.</p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results show that good to excellent outcome can be achieved in treating proximal humerus fractures using locking plates in elderly patients. Early mobilization of the shoulder can be achieved without compromising fracture union.


Author(s):  
Ritesh Kumar ◽  
S. Natarajan ◽  
Sanjeev Kumar ◽  
R. Kalanithi

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> Fracture of proximal humerus incidence has been reported to be 73 cases per 100,000 individuals per year. There are different methods of treatment of proximal humeral fractures. The aim of our study is to analyse the functional outcome of proximal humerus fractures treated with proximal humerus locking plates and to analyse the possible benefits and complications of the procedure<span lang="EN-IN">.</span></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> This is a retrospective study of 34 patients with proximal humeral fractures treated with ORIF using Proximal humeral locking plates from October 2010 to November 2012 at Saifee Hospital, Mumbai. The cases are evaluated as regards to functional outcome using constant score, fracture healing clinically, radiologically and complications if any and reason for them.<strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> Our study shows that proximal humerus fractures are now increasingly seen in younger population with good bone stock following high energy trauma. In elderly it was low energy trauma. The average time of radiological fracture union in our study was 10 weeks (8-16 weeks). The mean constant score at final follow up was 66.7 (35-90). A total of 17 patients (51%) had excellent or good results, but in 9 (27%) the outcome was poor. Eight (23%) complications were noted resulting in poor functional outcome<span lang="EN-IN">. </span></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Proximal humeral locking plate is a good method of osteosynthesis for complex proximal humerus fractures allowing early mobilization, good functional outcome. A reproducible standard surgical technique is absolutely necessary for improved patient outcome.  Most of the complications in our study were related to the surgical technique. The precise surgical technique, stable fracture fixation and restoration of correct neck shaft angle are absolutely necessary for improved outcome<span lang="EN-IN">.</span></p>


2010 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 66-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric T. Ricchetti ◽  
William J. Warrender ◽  
Joseph A. Abboud

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document