Adding modeled speech-generating device use to a naturalistic language intervention facilitates generalized communicative spoken utterances immediately after treatment and generalized gains on declarative use 12 weeks after treatment ends in children with ASD who began treatment in the “word combination” stage

2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 157-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul J. Yoder ◽  
Amy Harbison Tostanoski ◽  
Micheal P. Sandbank
2018 ◽  
Vol 61 (8) ◽  
pp. 2045-2061 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathy Thiemann-Bourque ◽  
Sarah Feldmiller ◽  
Lesa Hoffman ◽  
Stacy Johner

PurposeThis study examined the effects of incorporating a peer-mediated approach into a speech-generating device (SGD) intervention on communication of 45 nonverbal and minimally verbal preschoolers with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and 95 peers without disabilities. The SGD was an iPad 2 (Apple) with voice output app.MethodEffects were evaluated using a multivariate randomized control trial design with repeated measures for 4 cohorts across baseline, intervention, generalization, and maintenance phases. Children were randomly assigned to an experimental treatment that trained peers on use of the SGD or a business-as-usual comparison condition with untrained peers. Communication outcomes were measured for both children with ASD and peers.ResultsChildren receiving the treatment demonstrated significant increases in rates of communication and more balanced responses and initiations (a measure of reciprocity) than children in the comparison group. They were able to generalize improvements and maintain communication gains. Treatment fidelity was high for school staff and peer implementation.ConclusionsResults support positive effects on communication of teaching young children with ASD and peers without disabilities to use the same SGD system in typical preschool activities. SGD interventions that utilize peer-mediated approaches may improve core deficits in communication and reciprocity and allow for greater classroom social participation and interactions with peers.


2008 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 50-55
Author(s):  
Filip Loncke

Abstract The study of language acquisition and processing and the practice of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) intervention have a mutual beneficial impact. Each of the three major approaches in explaining language acquisition (rationalistic, empiricist, and functionalist) provides interesting perspectives in understanding the uniqueness of language acquisition through AAC. When looking at language processing, studies of AAC use can provide information on the multimodality and internal multimodal representational networks. The study of the main language components (phonology, morphology and syntax, lexicon) in AAC users raises interesting questions concerning (a) the effect of the use of a speech-generating device on an internal phonology, (b) the relation between morphological and syntactic rules and communicative effectiveness, and (c) the effect of the use of communication boards and devices on lexical development and lexical growth. AAC practice is a potential source of data that can lead to more effective intervention as well as to a better understanding of language processes in general.


2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 27-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jill E. Senner ◽  
Kathleen A. Post ◽  
Matthew R. Baud ◽  
Brian Patterson ◽  
Brianne Bolin ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document