adaptive interventions
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

78
(FIVE YEARS 42)

H-INDEX

14
(FIVE YEARS 3)

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 1-46
Author(s):  
Oswald Barral ◽  
SÉbastien LallÉ ◽  
Alireza Iranpour ◽  
Cristina Conati

We study the effectiveness of adaptive interventions at helping users process textual documents with embedded visualizations, a form of multimodal documents known as Magazine-Style Narrative Visualizations (MSNVs). The interventions are meant to dynamically highlight in the visualization the datapoints that are described in the textual sentence currently being read by the user, as captured by eye-tracking. These interventions were previously evaluated in two user studies that involved 98 participants reading excerpts of real-world MSNVs during a 1-hour session. Participants’ outcomes included their subjective feedback about the guidance, and well as their reading time and score on a set of comprehension questions. Results showed that the interventions can increase comprehension of the MSNV excerpts for users with lower levels of a cognitive skill known as visualization literacy. In this article, we aim to further investigate this result by leveraging eye-tracking to analyze in depth how the participants processed the interventions depending on their levels of visualization literacy. We first analyzed summative gaze metrics that capture how users process and integrate the key components of the narrative visualizations. Second, we mined the salient patterns in the users’ scanpaths to contextualize how users sequentially process these components. Results indicate that the interventions succeed in guiding attention to salient components of the narrative visualizations, especially by generating more transitions between key components of the visualization (i.e., datapoints, labels, and legend), as well as between the two modalities (text and visualization). We also show that the interventions help users with lower levels of visualization literacy to better map datapoints to the legend, which likely contributed to their improved comprehension of the documents. These findings shed light on how adaptive interventions help users with different levels of visualization literacy, informing the design of personalized narrative visualizations.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 553-554
Author(s):  
Aditya Bhattacharya ◽  
Shubo Tian ◽  
Nelson Roque ◽  
Zhe He ◽  
Walter Boot ◽  
...  

Abstract In cognitive training of older adults, adherence is a major challenge, but appropriate just-in-time adaptive interventions can improve adherence. To understand adherence patterns and predictors of adherence lapses, we aggregated data from two previous trials (N > 230) involving home-based cognitive interventions. This dataset, detailing 40,000 intervention interactions, contains information about intervention engagement and measures of objective and subjective cognitive performance, demographics, technology proficiency, and attitudes. Exploratory analyses were conducted to understand patterns and predictors of faltering adherence, using classification models, together with feature selection to remove redundant variables. Adherence behaviors in a week were predictive of quitting the following week. Game parameters such as the time of play were weak indicators of future playing patterns, whereas game success was a strong predictor of adherence. These and other useful observations will be incorporated in the design and development of the smart reminder system to be deployed in the APPT project.


2021 ◽  
pp. 001440292110241
Author(s):  
Greg Roberts ◽  
Nathan Clemens ◽  
Christian T. Doabler ◽  
Sharon Vaughn ◽  
Daniel Almirall ◽  
...  

This article introduces the special section on adaptive interventions and sequential multiple-assignment randomized trial (SMART) research designs. In addition to describing the two accompanying articles, we discuss features of adaptive interventions (AIs) and describe the use of SMART design to optimize AIs in the context of multitiered systems of support (MTSS) and integrated MTSS. AI is a treatment delivery model that explicitly specifies how information about individuals should be used to decide which treatment to provide in practice. Principles that apply to the design of AIs may help to more clearly operationalize MTSS-based programs, improve their implementation in school settings, and increase their efficacy when used according to evidence-based decision rules. A SMART is a research design for developing and optimizing MTSS-based programs. We provide a running example of a SMART design to optimize an MTSS-aligned AI that integrates academic and behavioral interventions.


Addiction ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olga Perski ◽  
Emily T. Hébert ◽  
Felix Naughton ◽  
Eric B. Hekler ◽  
Jamie Brown ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Sebastian Gruber ◽  
Bernd Neumayr ◽  
Michael Schrefl ◽  
Josef Niebauer

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-2
Author(s):  
Nikolaos Papaspanos

<b>Background:</b> Electronic (eHealth) and mobile (mHealth) health interventions can provide a large coverage, and are promising tools to change health behavior (i.e. physical activity, sedentary behavior and healthy eating). However, the determinants of intervention effectiveness in primary prevention has not been explored yet. Therefore, the objectives of this umbrella review were to evaluate intervention effectiveness, to explore the impact of pre-defined determinants of effectiveness (i.e. theoretical foundations, behavior change techniques, social contexts or just-in-time adaptive interventions), and to provide recommendations for future research and practice in the field of primary prevention delivered via e/mHealth technology. <b>Methods:</b> PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library were searched for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (reviews) published between January 1990 and May 2020. Reviews reporting on e/mHealth behavior change interventions in physical activity, sedentary behavior and/or healthy eating for healthy subjects (i.e. subjects without physical or physiological morbidities which would influence the realization of behaviors targeted by the respective interventions) were included if they also investigated respective theoretical foundations, behavior change techniques, social contexts or just-in-time adaptive interventions. Included studies were ranked concerning their method­ological quality and qualitatively synthesized. <b>Results:</b> The systematic search revealed 11 systematic reviews and meta-analyses of moderate quality. The majority of original research studies within the reviews found e/mHealth interventions to be effective, but the results showed a high heterogeneity concerning assessment methods and outcomes, making them difficult to compare. Whereas theoretical foundation and behavior change techniques were suggested to be potential positive determinants of effective interventions, the impact of social context remains unclear. None of the reviews included just-in-time adaptive interventions. <b>Conclusion:</b> Findings of this umbrella review support the use of e/mHealth to enhance physical activity and healthy eating and reduce sedentary behavior. The general lack of precise reporting and comparison of confounding variables in reviews and original research studies as well as the limited number of reviews for each health behavior constrains the generalization and interpretation of results. Further research is needed on study-level to investigate effects of versatile determinants of e/mHealth efficiency, using a theoretical foundation and additionally explore the impact of social contexts and more sophisticated approaches like just-in-time adaptive interventions. <b>Trial registration:</b> The protocol for this umbrella review was a priori registered with PROSPERO: CRD42020147902.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Adelaide M. Lusambili ◽  
Kadiatou Kadio ◽  
Matthew Chersich Chersich ◽  
Stanley Luchters ◽  
Seni Kouanda ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 074193252110306
Author(s):  
Lauren H. Hampton ◽  
Jason C. Chow

Special educators serve a diverse population of students with unique strengths and needs, and adaptive interventions that account for individual differences before and during the intervention are an important tool to moving the field toward more individualized practices. The purpose of this article is to detail the conceptualization and application of tailoring the sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART) design approach to developing and evaluating deeply tailored adaptive interventions through the application of secondary analyses to account for individual differences at multiple time points. This conceptual paper provides an overview beyond the basic SMART design components by describing the tactics, design options, and analyses currently available to further refine a SMART study into a more personalized intervention to account for individual differences at multiple points throughout the intervention and individual response to treatment.


Author(s):  
Elena D. Koch ◽  
Talar R. Moukhtarian ◽  
Caroline Skirrow ◽  
Natali Bozhilova ◽  
Philip Asherson ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document