scholarly journals Integrated urban renewal in The Netherlands: a critical appraisal

2008 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 78-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sako Musterd ◽  
Wim Ostendorf
Quaerendo ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 40 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 327-364
Author(s):  
Salma Chen ◽  
Sjoerd van Faassen

AbstractThis article is a critical appraisal of the publishing activities during the Second World War of the renowned publisher A.A.M. Stols. The research presented shows that subsequent statements made by Stols regarding this period cannot all be taken at face value. Despite the commercially fruitful activities that he developed during the occupation of the Netherlands, after the war Stols failed to maintain the position of eminence that he had achieved before it.


BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. e031644 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harumi Quezada-Yamamoto ◽  
Elizabeth Dubois ◽  
Nikolaos Mastellos ◽  
Salman Rawaf

ObjectiveTo identify current uptake of chlamydia testing (UCT) as a sexual and reproductive health service (SRHS) integrated in primary care settings of the WHO European region, with the aim to shape policy and quality of care.DesignSystematic review for studies published from January 2001 to May 2018 in any European language.Data sourcesOVID Medline, EMBASE, Maternal and Infant Care and Global Health.Eligibility criteriaPublished studies, which involved women or men, adolescents or adults, reporting a UCT indicator in a primary care within a WHO European region country. Study designs considered were: randomised control trials (RCTs), quasi-experimental, observational (eg, cohort, case–control, cross-sectional) and mixed-methods studies as well as case reports.Data extraction and synthesisTwo independent reviewers screened the sources and validated the selection process. The BRIGGS Critical Appraisal Checklist for Analytical Cross-Sectional Studies, the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool 2011 and Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklists were considered for quality and risk of bias assessment.Results24 studies were finally included, of which 15 were cross-sectional, 4 cohort, 2 RCTs, 2 case–control studies and 1 mixed-methods study. A majority of the evidence cites the UK model, followed by the Netherlands, Denmark, Norway and Belgium only. Acceptability if offered test in primary healthcare (PHC) ranged from 55% to 81.4% in women and from 9.5% to 70.6% when both genders were reported together. Men may have a lower UCT compared with women. When both genders were reported together, the lowest acceptability was 9.5% in the Netherlands. Denmark presented the highest percentage of eligible people who tested in a PHC setting (87.3%).ConclusionsDifferent health systems may influence UCT in PHC. The regional use of a common testing rate indicator is suggested to homogenise reporting. There is very little evidence on integration of SRHS such as chlamydia testing in PHC and there are gaps between European countries.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document