Area studies and the disciplines: Japanese Studies and anthropology in comparative perspective

2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 240-261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eyal Ben-Ari
1993 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 475 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerardo L. Munck ◽  
Ruth Berins Collier ◽  
David Collier ◽  
Alain Touraine

2004 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 121-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris Burgess

This paper explores the link between globalization, as the source of contemporary crises in representation, and the academic crisis in Asian Studies. The situation of Japanese Studies in Australia is used as a case study to illustrate these links. I argue that traditional area studies, as a colonial structure rooted in the (Cold) War, has become anachronistic. It is suggested that one strategy through which conventional area studies may be reconfigured and revitalized is by more fully and warmly embracing those movements or networks such as cultural studies that can be seen as responses to global changes.


1998 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-87
Author(s):  
Narita Ryūichi ◽  
Tessa Morris‐Suzuki ◽  
Yao Souchou

2021 ◽  
pp. 9-28
Author(s):  
Edwin F. Ackerman

This chapter measures up existing approaches to party formation against the rise of the Partido Revolucionario Institucional (PRI) in post-revolutionary Mexico (1929–1946) and the attempt but ultimate failure of Bolivia’s Movimiento Nacionalista Revolucionario (1953–1964) to undertake a homologous process in the aftermath of the 1952 uprising, despite similarity in conditions. The chapters offers a critical review of existing theories of mass party formation and area studies literature, pointing to the limitations of ‘reflective’ and ‘state-modernizations’ approaches to the study of parties. Finally, it lays out the methodological and analytical strategy guiding the empirical chapters of Part II of the book.


2020 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. 194-206
Author(s):  
Matthias Basedau

This article takes stock of the state of African Studies and argues that (1) research on Africa is strongly dominated by outside, non-African, mostly Western views; (2) there is a tendency towards undifferentiated views on “Africa,” which usually concentrate on negative aspects, overlooking progress in many areas; (3) methodologies that focus on causal identification are rarely used; and (4) the field focuses on micro-perspectives while few works examine the big picture and the longue durée. The article then argues that Comparative African Studies, which builds upon the concept of Comparative Area Studies, can address some of these challenges. A pronouncedly comparative perspective would help to systematically combine and contrast “outside” and “inside” perspectives in order to better identify causal relationships and general trends both within Africa and between Africa and other regions. Consequently, African Studies requires more resources and should more effectively engage in multi-disciplinary and mixed-methods research.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document