Improving Diabetes Care in the Latino Population: The Emory Latino Diabetes Education Program

2016 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Britt Rotberg ◽  
Rachel Greene ◽  
Anyul M. Ferez-Pinzon ◽  
Robert Mejia ◽  
Guillermo Umpierrez
Diabetes Care ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. 1116.3-1116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda M. Siminerio ◽  
Ann Albright ◽  
Judith Fradkin ◽  
Joanne Gallivan ◽  
Jude McDivitt ◽  
...  

Diabetes Care ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 343-344 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin A. Peterson ◽  
Marie T. Brown ◽  
Elizabeth Warren-Boulton

Diabetes Care ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 617-618 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. M. Clark ◽  
J. E. Fradkin ◽  
R. G. Hiss ◽  
R. A. Lorenz ◽  
F. Vinicor ◽  
...  

Diabetes ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 69 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 621-P
Author(s):  
ZACHARY WHITE ◽  
RYAN WOOLLEY ◽  
SHEILA AMANAT ◽  
KELLY MUELLER

Author(s):  
Emina Hadziabdic ◽  
Sara Pettersson ◽  
Helén Marklund ◽  
Katarina Hjelm

Abstract Aim: To develop a diabetes education model based on individual beliefs, knowledge and risk awareness, aimed at migrants with type 2 diabetes, living in Sweden. Background: Type 2 diabetes is rapidly increasing globally, particularly affecting migrants living in developed countries. There is ongoing debate about what kind of teaching method gives the best result, but few studies have evaluated different methods for teaching migrants. Previous studies lack a theoretical base and do not proceed from the individuals’ own beliefs about health and illness, underpinned by their knowledge, guiding their health-related behaviour. Methods: A diabetes education model was developed to increase knowledge about diabetes and to influence self-care among migrants with type 2 diabetes. The model was based on literature review, on results from a previous study investigating knowledge about diabetes, on experience from studies of beliefs about health and illness, and on collaboration between researchers in diabetes care and migration and health and staff working in a multi-professional diabetes team. Findings: This is a culturally appropriate diabetes education model proceeding from individual beliefs about health and illness and knowledge, conducted in focus-group discussions in five sessions, led by a diabetes specialist nurse in collaboration with a multi-professional team, and completed within three months. The focus groups should include 4–5 persons and last for about 90 min, in the presence of an interpreter. A thematic interview guide should be used, with broad open-ended questions and descriptions of critical situations/health problems. Discussions of individual beliefs based on knowledge are encouraged. When needed, healthcare staff present at the session answer questions, add information and ensure that basic principles for diabetes care are covered. The diabetes education model is tailored to both individual and cultural aspects and can improve knowledge about type 2 diabetes, among migrants and thus increase self-care behaviour and improve health.


2021 ◽  
pp. 193229682110014
Author(s):  
Thomas W. Martens ◽  
Janet S. Lima ◽  
Elizabeth A. Johnson ◽  
Jessica A. Conry ◽  
Jennifer J. Hoppe ◽  
...  

Background: Quality measures relating to diabetes care in America have not improved between 2005 and 2016, and have plateaued even in areas that outperform national statistics. New approaches to diabetes care and education are needed and are especially important in reaching populations with significant barriers to optimized care. Methods: A pilot quality improvement study was created to optimize diabetes education in a clinic setting with a patient population with significant healthcare barriers. Certified Diabetes Care and Education Specialists (CDCES) were deployed in a team-based model with flexible scheduling and same-day education visits, outside of the traditional framework of diabetes education, specifically targeting practices with underperforming diabetes quality measures, in a clinic setting significantly impacted by social determinants of health. Results: A team-based and flexible diabetes education model decreased hemoglobin A1C for individuals participating in the project (and having a second A1C measured) by an average of −2.3%, improved Minnesota Diabetes Quality Measures (D5) for clinicians participating in the project by 5.8%, optimized use of CDCES, and reduced a high visit fail rate for diabetes education. Conclusions: Diabetes education provided in a team-based and flexible model may better meet patient needs and improve diabetes care metrics, in settings with a patient population with significant barriers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document