scholarly journals Translation and validation of a Swedish version of the BODY-Q: a patient-reported outcome instrument for weight loss and body contouring surgery

Author(s):  
Monika Fagevik Olsén ◽  
Christina Biörserud ◽  
Micheline Al Nouh ◽  
Trude Staalesen ◽  
Anna Elander
2008 ◽  
Vol 41 (S 01) ◽  
pp. 114-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prabhat Shrivastava ◽  
Aggarwal Aditya ◽  
Khazanchi Rakesh Kumar

ABSTRACTThe number of patients with history of extreme overweight and massive weight loss (MWL) has risen significantly. Majority of patients are left with loose, ptotic skin envelopes, and oddly shaped protuberances, subsequent to weight loss. Redundant skin and fat can be seen anywhere on the body following MWL. This group of population presents many unique problems and challenges. Body contouring surgery after MWL is a new and exciting field in plastic surgery that is still evolving. Conventional approaches do not adequately cater to the needs of these patients. Complete history, detailed physical examination, clinical photographs and lab investigations help to plan the most appropriate procedure for the individual patient. Proper counseling and comprehensive informed consent for each procedure are mandatory. The meticulous and precise markings based on the procedure selected are the cornerstones to achieve the successful outcome. Lower body contouring should be performed first followed six months later by breast, lateral chest and arm procedures. Thighplasty is usually undertaken at the end. Body contouring operations are staged at few months′ intervals and often result in long scars. Staging is important as each procedure can have positive impact on adjacent areas of the body. Secondary procedures are often required. However, proper planning should lead to fewer complications and improved aesthetic outcome and patient satisfaction.


2014 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 575-583 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Danilla ◽  
Carlos Dominguez ◽  
Pedro Cuevas ◽  
María Elsa Calderón ◽  
Marco Antonio Rios ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 584-584
Author(s):  
Stefan Danilla ◽  
Carlos Dominguez ◽  
Pedro Cuevas ◽  
María Elsa Calderón ◽  
Marco Antonio Rios ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (10) ◽  
pp. e1529 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lotte Poulsen ◽  
Anne Klassen ◽  
Michael Rose ◽  
Kirsten K. Roessler ◽  
Claus Bogh Juhl ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 140 (3) ◽  
pp. 491-500 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lotte Poulsen ◽  
Anne Klassen ◽  
Michael Rose ◽  
Kirsten K. Roessler ◽  
Claus Bogh Juhl ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shehab Jabir

Body contouring following massive weight loss is a rapidly expanding field in plastic surgery. However, healthcare payers are reluctant to fund such procedures, viewing them as purely cosmetic. This has resulted in a flurry of studies assessing quality of life (QoL) and patient satisfaction following body contouring surgery in this cohort of patients to establish an evidence base to support the idea that body contouring is as much (or even more) a functional procedure as it is cosmetic. However, the methods employed in these studies are seldom ideal, and hence the conclusions are unreliable. The gold standard to assess QoL and patient satisfaction is to use patient specific psychometrically validated patient reported outcome (PRO) measures. Developing such measures consists of a three-step process which includes a review of the current literature, qualitative patient interviews to determine what patients consider the most important, and expert opinion. This study aims to appraise the currently available literature on assessment of QoL and patient satisfaction in body contouring surgery patients. This will hopefully provide an understanding of methodological weaknesses in current studies and inform future investigators of the design of ideal instruments for assessing QoL and patient satisfaction in body contouring patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document