P-B01 First Inventory of Access and Quality of Metabolic Surgery across Europe

Background Europe consists of 51 independent countries. Variation in healthcare regulations results in differing challenges faced by patients and professionals. The obesity pandemic has multiple health, economic and social implications. However, metabolic surgery is not universally accessible, with significant variations in its provision. This study aimed to gain insight into compliance with international guidelines; the accessibility and barriers to surgery; patient pathways and qualitor indicators of both metabolic and body contouring surgery after weight loss in different European countries. Methods This study was initiated during the European Obesity Academy (EOA). Expert representatives in the metabolic field from all 51 European countries were sent a novel, 37-item, electronic self-administered online questionnaire on their data and experiences from the previous year exploring accessibility to and quality indicators for metabolic surgery and body contouring surgery after weight loss. The survey tool was peer-reviewed by experienced researchers and piloted by fifteen experienced researchers with a spread of seniority and specialty. Content and face validity were ensured by peer-review and the piloting process. 45 completed responses were collected. Results 68% of countries had eligibility criteria for metabolic surgery; 59% adhered to these. 46% had reimbursement criteria for metabolic surgery. 41% had eligibility criteria for plastic surgery and 31% reimbursement criteria. Average tariffs for a metabolic procedure varied (€800-€ 16000). MDTs were mandated in 78%, with team members varying significantly. Referral practises differed. In 45% metabolic surgery is performed by pure metabolic surgeons. 23% had a metabolic training program. Access to metabolic surgery was rated poor/ very poor in 33%. 35% had a bariatric registry. 24% required a minimum procedure number for metabolic centres; varying from 25 to 200 procedures. Conclusions This is the first study to describe accessibility and quality data on metabolic and body contouring surgery from most European countries. There are myriad differences between European countries in terms of accessibility to metabolic surgery. Lack of funding, education and structure fuels this disparity. We hope this study will impact standardisation of access and quality indicators for metabolic and body contouring surgery across European countries, as well as be a springboard for further evaluation of international metabolic surgery practices.

Body Image Concerns and Associated Impairment Among Adults Seeking Body Contouring Following Bariatric Surgery

Background The current study examined a range of body image concerns and associated distress and impairment in patients who have undergone bariatric surgery and are seeking subsequent body contouring surgery following bariatric surgery. Objectives Individuals seeking body contouring were hypothesized to endorse a broad pattern of body image concerns and that overall body image concern would be associated with greater impairment and disability. Methods Participants were 56 adults seeking body contouring surgery after bariatric surgery. Participants completed a self-report questionnaire designed for the present study to assess body image concerns specific to patients who have undergone bariatric surgery and a battery of established measures of disability, impairment, and eating-disorder psychopathology. Results The most commonly endorsed concerns were related to loose skin (body dissatisfaction, feeling embarrassed in public, and skin rashes) whereas the least endorsed items included concerns related to scars from bariatric surgery (body dissatisfaction, avoidance of social situations, and difficulty concentrating). Participants endorsed a broad pattern of frequent distress and impairment related to physical body image changes post-bariatric surgery. Greater body image concerns were associated significantly with higher levels of disability, work-related impairment, and eating-disorder psychopathology. Conclusions Patients seeking body contouring surgery reported a range of body image concerns with significant associated distress, disability, and impairment related to physical changes post-bariatric surgery. The present findings underscore that while bariatric surgery is effective for reducing weight and metabolic disturbances, additional interventions for addressing body image concerns that are frequently distressing and impairing may be needed.

Experience of Excess Skin and Attitude to Body Contouring Surgery of a Chinese Post-Bariatric Population

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Western studies have explored post-bariatric patients concerning their views on excess skin and body contouring surgery (BCS), but Asian data were lacking. This study aims to investigate the experience of excess skin and attitude to BCS of a Chinese post-bariatric population. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A total of 210 Chinese patients who underwent bariatric surgery from March 2015 to September 2018 were cross-sectional studied using the Sahlgrenska Excess Skin Questionnaire and a study-specific questionnaire. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The survey response rate was 61.4%. Most responders (78.2%) reported they had excess skin, and the most common sites were the abdomen (70.2%) and the upper arms (61.3%). Most responders (66.1%) reported being bothered by impaired health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and the most common problem was “the feeling of having unattractive body appearance” (42.7%). Many patients (37.9%) desired for BCS, and “the impact of excess skin is not serious enough” was the reason why not undergoing BCS being chosen most (28.1%), then “the cost is too high” (20.2%) and “worrying about the risk or complications of BCS” (18.4%). Younger age, female gender, higher weight loss, having full-time job, and earning higher income were independent factors increasing their desires for BCS. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Most Chinese post-bariatric patients have excess skin and are bothered by impaired HRQoL. The abdomen and upper arms are the sites where patients are most seriously affected and most eager for BCS. The conservative attitude toward BCS and the cost without reimbursement are the main barriers.