Clinical peer Review; A mandatory process with potential inherent bias in desperate need of reform

Husam Bader; Mohammad Abdulelah; Rama Maghnam; David Chin

doi:10.1080/20009666.2021.1965704

Clinical peer Review; A mandatory process with potential inherent bias in desperate need of reform

Journal of Community Hospital Internal Medicine Perspectives ◽

10.1080/20009666.2021.1965704 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 11 (6) ◽

pp. 817-820

Author(s):

Husam Bader ◽

Mohammad Abdulelah ◽

Rama Maghnam ◽

David Chin

Keyword(s):

Peer Review

Download Full-text

Peer review of a dental curriculum: how one school did it

Journal of Dental Education ◽

10.1002/j.0022-0337.1976.40.11.tb01046.x ◽

1976 ◽

Vol 40 (11) ◽

pp. 761-762

Author(s):

PK Morse ◽

TR Dirksen

Keyword(s):

Peer Review ◽

Dental Curriculum

Download Full-text

Editorial: Peer review: A matter of expectations

Environmental Science & Technology ◽

10.1021/es00130a600 ◽

1984 ◽

Vol 18 (12) ◽

pp. 353-353

Keyword(s):

Peer Review

Download Full-text

An empirical review of gambling expansion and gambling-related harm

SUCHT - Zeitschrift für Wissenschaft und Praxis / Journal of Addiction Research and Practice ◽

10.1024/0939-5911/a000563 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 64 (5-6) ◽

pp. 295-306 ◽

Cited By ~ 8

Author(s):

Debi A. LaPlante ◽

Heather M. Gray ◽

Pat M. Williams ◽

Sarah E. Nelson

Keyword(s):

Literature Review ◽

Peer Review ◽

Empirical Data ◽

Empirical Studies ◽

Expansion Method ◽

Responsible Gambling ◽

Review Literature ◽

Evidence Based ◽

Empirical Comparison ◽

Related Harm

Abstract. Aims: To discuss and review the latest research related to gambling expansion. Method: We completed a literature review and empirical comparison of peer reviewed findings related to gambling expansion and subsequent gambling-related changes among the population. Results: Although gambling expansion is associated with changes in gambling and gambling-related problems, empirical studies suggest that these effects are mixed and the available literature is limited. For example, the peer review literature suggests that most post-expansion gambling outcomes (i. e., 22 of 34 possible expansion outcomes; 64.7 %) indicate no observable change or a decrease in gambling outcomes, and a minority (i. e., 12 of 34 possible expansion outcomes; 35.3 %) indicate an increase in gambling outcomes. Conclusions: Empirical data related to gambling expansion suggests that its effects are more complex than frequently considered; however, evidence-based intervention might help prepare jurisdictions to deal with potential consequences. Jurisdictions can develop and evaluate responsible gambling programs to try to mitigate the impacts of expanded gambling.

Download Full-text