scholarly journals Yeast chemotropism: A paradigm shift in chemical gradient sensing

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. e1314237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amber Ismael ◽  
David E. Stone
2012 ◽  
Vol 198 (6) ◽  
pp. 1075-1091 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nachiket D. Kashikar ◽  
Luis Alvarez ◽  
Reinhard Seifert ◽  
Ingo Gregor ◽  
Oliver Jäckle ◽  
...  

Sperm, navigating in a chemical gradient, are exposed to a periodic stream of chemoattractant molecules. The periodic stimulation entrains Ca2+ oscillations that control looping steering responses. It is not known how sperm sample chemoattractant molecules during periodic stimulation and adjust their sensitivity. We report that sea urchin sperm sampled molecules for 0.2–0.6 s before a Ca2+ response was produced. Additional molecules delivered during a Ca2+ response reset the cell by causing a pronounced Ca2+ drop that terminated the response; this reset was followed by a new Ca2+ rise. After stimulation, sperm adapted their sensitivity following the Weber–Fechner law. Taking into account the single-molecule sensitivity, we estimate that sperm can register a minimal gradient of 0.8 fM/µm and be attracted from as far away as 4.7 mm. Many microorganisms sense stimulus gradients along periodic paths to translate a spatial distribution of the stimulus into a temporal pattern of the cell response. Orchestration of temporal sampling, resetting, and adaptation might control gradient sensing in such organisms as well.


2017 ◽  
Vol 114 (47) ◽  
pp. E10074-E10082 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian A. Camley ◽  
Wouter-Jan Rappel

When a single cell senses a chemical gradient and chemotaxes, stochastic receptor–ligand binding can be a fundamental limit to the cell’s accuracy. For clusters of cells responding to gradients, however, there is a critical difference: Even genetically identical cells have differing responses to chemical signals. With theory and simulation, we show collective chemotaxis is limited by cell-to-cell variation in signaling. We find that when different cells cooperate, the resulting bias can be much larger than the effects of ligand–receptor binding. Specifically, when a strongly responding cell is at one end of a cell cluster, cluster motion is biased toward that cell. These errors are mitigated if clusters average measurements over times long enough for cells to rearrange. In consequence, fluid clusters are better able to sense gradients: We derive a link between cluster accuracy, cell-to-cell variation, and the cluster rheology. Because of this connection, increasing the noisiness of individual cell motion can actually increase the collective accuracy of a cluster by improving fluidity.


1985 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-17
Author(s):  
Marion Perlmutter
Keyword(s):  

1994 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 197-198
Author(s):  
Raymond T. Garza
Keyword(s):  

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wendy L. Bedwell ◽  
Aaron S. Dietz ◽  
Kathryn E. Keeton ◽  
Daniel Tani ◽  
Gerald Goodwin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Vol 04 (01) ◽  
pp. 4-10

AbstractImmunosuppression permits graft survival after transplantation and consequently a longer and better life. On the other hand, it increases the risk of infection, for instance with cytomegalovirus (CMV). However, the various available immunosuppressive therapies differ in this regard. One of the first clinical trials using de novo everolimus after kidney transplantation [1] already revealed a considerably lower incidence of CMV infection in the everolimus arms than in the mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) arm. This result was repeatedly confirmed in later studies [2–4]. Everolimus is now considered a substance with antiviral properties. This article is based on the expert meeting “Posttransplant CMV infection and the role of immunosuppression”. The expert panel called for a paradigm shift: In a CMV prevention strategy the targeted selection of the immunosuppressive therapy is also a key element. For patients with elevated risk of CMV, mTOR inhibitor-based immunosuppression is advantageous as it is associated with a significantly lower incidence of CMV events.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document