The Place of Common Bond: Can Credit Unions Make Place for Solidarity Economy?

2019 ◽  
Vol 110 (4) ◽  
pp. 1278-1299
Author(s):  
Marianna Pavlovskaya ◽  
Craig Borowiak ◽  
Maliha Safri ◽  
Stephen Healy ◽  
Robert Eletto
2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 481-500
Author(s):  
Hoang Van Cuong ◽  
Hiep Ngoc Luu ◽  
Loan Quynh Thi Nguyen ◽  
Vu Tuan Chu

PurposeThe purposes of this paper are twofold. First, it analyses the income structure in cooperative financial institutions and examines how traditional and non-traditional incomes are related. Second, it evaluates whether increasing diversification towards non-traditional incomes facilitates or hampers the benefits of financial cooperative owners.Design/methodology/approachData are collected from over 3,100 US credit unions over the period of 1994–2016. A number of modern econometric techniques are employed throughout the analysis, including the use of panel fixed effect, generalised method of moments (GMM) and two-stage least square (2SLS) methodologies.FindingsUsing US credit unions as the empirical setting, the empirical results reveal that the expansion of traditional income leads to a corresponding increase in income from non-traditional activities. However, an increasing reliance on non-traditional income causes a significant drop in interest margins. The authors also find that the extent to which income diversification affects owner benefit varies across credit union types and period of time. While income diversification negatively affects owners' benefits in single common bond credit unions, it has no significant influence on multiple common bond and community credit union owners' benefits. Third, diversification can be beneficial during crisis time, but can be detrimental to owner benefit during normal time.Originality/valueThis paper provides some of the first empirical investigations on the diversification strategy of cooperative financial institutions. Therefore, the results offer significant policy implications for policymakers and market participants on whether financial cooperatives should diversify or specialise.


2004 ◽  
pp. 253-263
Author(s):  
James D. Tripp ◽  
Peppi M. Kenny ◽  
Don T. Johnson
Keyword(s):  

1999 ◽  
Vol 81 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
William R. Emmons ◽  
Frank A. Schmid
Keyword(s):  

1987 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 89-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harold A. Black ◽  
Robert L. Schweitzer

This article compares the financial characteristics of black-controlled credit unions by type of common bond. The study found that many of the operational differences of these credit unions can be attributed to institutional characteristics associated with the three distinct types of credit unions. It also found that black credit unions are viable financial institutions, regardless of type of common bond. This finding is linked to the ownership of credit unions by its membership. This unique relationship has implications for black economic development.


2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
William R. Emmons ◽  
Frank A. Schmid
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
William R. Emmons ◽  
Frank A. Schmid
Keyword(s):  

1999 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 235-245 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith J. Leggett ◽  
Yvonne H. Stewart
Keyword(s):  

1963 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 55-58
Author(s):  
Leslie B. Schwinn
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Lyudmila Nikolayevna Akimova ◽  
Alla Vasilievna Lysachok

The essence of such concepts is “financial service”, “financial ser- vices market”, and “participants of the financial services market”; determined the purpose of state regulation of the financial services market; forms of state regu- lation of the financial services market; financial services that are present in the financial services market; the structure of state regulation bodies of the financial services market in Ukraine is given; The role of state bodies in the regulation of the financial services market was studied; to characterize the regulatory le- gal regulation of the financial services market in Ukraine; the main problems of functioning of the domestic market of financial services are revealed; ways to solve existing problems. It is grounded that the state regulation of financial ser- vices markets consists in the state’s implementation of a set of measures aimed at regulating and overseeing financial services markets to protect the interests of financial services consumers and preventing crisis phenomena. It is concluded that the financial services market is an important element of the development of the economy as a whole, in particular, it concerns not only the state but also society. We must understand that when this market is settled, that is, all bodies that carry out state regulation are competent in their powers, only then will we make informed, effective decisions about the normal and effective functioning of the RFP. It is important that the data of the subjects of control do not overlap, their activities should be fixed at the legislative level. It is also worth bearing in mind that appropriate conditions must be created to create compensatory mecha- nisms in the financial services markets by developing a system for guarante- eing deposits and providing for payments under long-term life insurance contracts, non-state pension provisions, deposits with deposit accounts to credit unions, etс.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document