Irrelevant Sound Disrupts Order Information in Free Recall as in Serial Recall

1998 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 615-636 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Philip Beaman ◽  
Dylan M. Jones

The claim that the sensitivity of free recall to disruption by irrelevant sound is a function of the extent to which rote rehearsal is employed as a mnemonic strategy was investigated in two experiments. The degree of disruption by irrelevant sound in terms of both item and order information was contrasted under serial and free recall instructions. Irrelevant sound was found to disrupt order and item information equally in serial and free recall tasks (Experiment 1). Contrary to previous reports, an effect of irrelevant sound was also demonstrated on free recall of particularly long lists, and the interaction between list length and retention interval in the irrelevant sound effect was examined (Experiment 2). Generally, the results support the view that irrelevant sound disrupts the use of order cues.

2013 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 609-621 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan P. Röer ◽  
Raoul Bell ◽  
Axel Buchner

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily M. Elliott ◽  
Kenneth Barideaux ◽  
Alicia M. Briganti

Author(s):  
Simon P. Banbury ◽  
Dylan M. Jones ◽  
Lucy Emery

2013 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 306-316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie-France Pelletier ◽  
Helen M. Hodgetts ◽  
Martin F. Lafleur ◽  
Annick Vincent ◽  
Sébastien Tremblay

2008 ◽  
Vol 123 (5) ◽  
pp. 3161-3161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabine J. Schlittmeier ◽  
Tobias Weissgerber ◽  
Stefan Kerber ◽  
Hugo Fastl ◽  
Juergen Hellbrueck

1965 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 877-883 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas L. Rohrman ◽  
John C. Jahnke

A total of 300 university students were presented a brief list of non-alphanumeric items and instructed to recall immediately either the items (free recall, FR), the order in which the items were presented (order recall, OR), or both (serial recall, SR). Presentation rate and retention interval were additional experimental variables in Exp. I and II, respectively. In both experiments significant differences in recall were found between FR conditions and the remaining two, which did not differ from each other. More items were recalled at the slow than fas: rate. Retention interval was not a significant variable. Results suggest that retention will improve when order information is eliminated from recall (Brown, 1958), that the recall of item and order information involve at least partially independent memory processes, and that, while the recall of items may proceed independently of the recall of their order, the converse is not true.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document