Effect of Na+ Flow on Cd2+ Block of Tetrodotoxin-resistant Na+ Channels

Tetrodotoxin-resistant (TTX-R) Na+ channels are 1,000-fold less sensitive to TTX than TTX-sensitive (TTX-S) Na+ channels. On the other hand, TTX-R channels are much more susceptible to external Cd2+ block than TTX-S channels. A cysteine (or serine) residue situated just next to the aspartate residue of the presumable selectivity filter “DEKA” ring of the TTX-R channel has been identified as the key ligand determining the binding affinity of both TTX and Cd2+. In this study we demonstrate that the binding affinity of Cd2+ to the TTX-R channels in neurons from dorsal root ganglia has little intrinsic voltage dependence, but is significantly influenced by the direction of Na+ current flow. In the presence of inward Na+ current, the apparent dissociation constant of Cd2+ (∼200 μM) is ∼9 times smaller than that in the presence of outward Na+ current. The Na+ flow–dependent binding affinity change of Cd2+ block is true no matter whether the direction of Na+ current is secured by asymmetrical chemical gradient (e.g., 150 mM Na+ vs. 150 mM Cs+ on different sides of the membrane, 0 mV) or by asymmetrical electrical gradient (e.g., 150 mM Na+ on both sides of the membrane, −20 mV vs. 20 mV). These findings suggest that Cd2+ is a pore blocker of TTX-R channels with its binding site located in a multiion, single-file region near the external pore mouth. Quantitative analysis of the flow dependence with the flux-coupling equation reveals that at least two Na+ ions coexist with the blocking Cd2+ ion in this pore region in the presence of 150 mM ambient Na+. Thus, the selectivity filter of the TTX-R Na+ channels in dorsal root ganglion neurons might be located in or close to a multiion single-file pore segment connected externally to a wide vestibule, a molecular feature probably shared by other voltage-gated cationic channels, such as some Ca2+ and K+ channels.

Download Full-text

Block of Tetrodotoxin-resistant Na+ Channel Pore by Multivalent Cations

The Journal of General Physiology ◽

10.1085/jgp.200409054 ◽

2004 ◽

Vol 124 (1) ◽

pp. 27-42 ◽

Cited By ~ 30

Author(s):

Chung-Chin Kuo ◽

Wan-Yu Chen ◽

Ya-Chin Yang

Keyword(s):

Conformational Changes ◽

Selectivity Filter ◽

Dorsal Root Ganglion Neurons ◽

Inactivation Kinetics ◽

Na Channel ◽

Na Channels ◽

Na Current ◽

Single File ◽

Pore Mouth ◽

Ganglion Neurons

Tetrodotoxin-resistant (TTX-R) Na+ channels are much less susceptible to external TTX but more susceptible to external Cd2+ block than tetrodotoxin-sensitive (TTX-S) Na+ channels. Both TTX and Cd2+ seem to block the channel near the “DEKA” ring, which is probably part of a multi-ion single-file region adjacent to the external pore mouth and is involved in the selectivity filter of the channel. In this study we demonstrate that other multivalent transitional metal ions such as La3+, Zn2+, Ni2+, Co2+, and Mn2+ also block the TTX-R channels in dorsal root ganglion neurons. Just like Cd2+, the blocking effect has little intrinsic voltage dependence, but is profoundly influenced by Na+ flow. The apparent dissociation constants of the blocking ions are always significantly smaller in inward Na+ currents than those in outward Na+ current, signaling exit of the blocker along with the Na+ flow and a high internal energy barrier for “permeation” of these multivalent blocking ions through the pore. Most interestingly, the activation and especially the inactivation kinetics are slowed by the blocking ions. Moreover, the gating changes induced by the same concentration of a blocking ion are evidently different in different directions of Na+ current flow, but can always be correlated with the extent of pore block. Further quantitative analyses indicate that the apparent slowing of channel activation is chiefly ascribable to Na+ flow–dependent unblocking of the bound La3+ from the open Na+ channel, whereas channel inactivation cannot happen with any discernible speed in the La3+-blocked channel. Thus, the selectivity filter of Na+ channel is probably contiguous to a single-file multi-ion region at the external pore mouth, a region itself being nonselective in terms of significant binding of different multivalent cations. This region is “open” to the external solution even if the channel is “closed” (“deactivated”), but undergoes imperative conformational changes during the gating (especially the inactivation) process of the channel.

Download Full-text

Effect of Drugs Used for Neuropathic Pain Management on Tetrodotoxin-resistant Na+Currents in Rat Sensory Neurons

Anesthesiology ◽

10.1097/00000542-200101000-00024 ◽

2001 ◽

Vol 94 (1) ◽

pp. 137-144 ◽

Cited By ~ 108

Author(s):

Michael E. Bräu ◽

Marc Dreimann ◽

Andrea Olschewski ◽

Werner Vogel ◽

Gunter Hempelmann

Keyword(s):

Neuropathic Pain ◽

Membrane Potential ◽

Dorsal Root ◽

Dorsal Root Ganglion Neurons ◽

Repetitive Firing ◽

Dependent Manner ◽

Na Channels ◽

Na Current ◽

Na Currents ◽

Ganglion Neurons

Background Tetrodotoxin-resistant Na(+) channels play an important role in generation and conduction of nociceptive discharges in peripheral endings of small-diameter axons of the peripheral nervous system. Pathophysiologically, these channels may produce ectopic discharges in damaged nociceptive fibers, leading to neuropathic pain syndromes. Systemically applied Na(+) channel--blocking drugs can alleviate pain, the mechanism of which is rather unresolved. The authors investigated the effects of some commonly used drugs, i.e., lidocaine, mexiletine, carbamazepine, amitriptyline, memantine, and gabapentin, on tetrodotoxin-resistant Na+ channels in rat dorsal root ganglia. Methods Tetrodotoxin-resistant Na(+) currents were recorded in the whole-cell configuration of the patch-clamp method in enzymatically dissociated dorsal root ganglion neurons of adult rats. Half-maximal blocking concentrations were derived from concentration-inhibition curves at different holding potentials (-90, -70, and -60 mV). Results Lidocaine, mexiletine, and amitriptyline reversibly blocked tetrodotoxin-resistant Na(+) currents in a concentration- and use-dependent manner. Block by carbamazepine and memantine was not use-dependent at 2 Hz. Gabapentin had no effect at concentrations of up to 3 mm. Depolarizing the membrane potential from -90 mV to -60 mV reduced the available Na(+) current only by 23% but increased the sensitivity of the channels to the use-dependent blockers approximately fivefold. The availability curve of the current was shifted by 5.3 mV to the left in 300 microm lidocaine. Conclusions Less negative membrane potential and repetitive firing have little effect on tetrodotoxin-resistant Na(+) current amplitude but increase their sensitivity to lidocaine, mexiletine, and amitriptyline so that concentrations after intravenous administration of these drugs can impair channel function. This may explain alleviation from pain by reducing firing frequency in ectopic sites without depressing central nervous or cardiac excitability.

Download Full-text