Conjugal Power and Decision Making: A Methodological Note on Cross-Cultural Study of the Family

1973 ◽  
Vol 79 (1) ◽  
pp. 84-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
William T. Liu ◽  
Ira W. Hutchison ◽  
Lawrence K. Hong
Human Nature ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 318-335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurence Fiddick ◽  
Denise Dellarosa Cummins ◽  
Maria Janicki ◽  
Sean Lee ◽  
Nicole Erlich

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (19) ◽  
pp. 343-360
Author(s):  
Mohammad Reza Karimi Alavijeh ◽  
Ramine Kalhor ◽  
Mohammad Mehdi Ahmadi

2011 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marla Royne Stafford ◽  
Gopala Ganesh ◽  
Michael G. Luckett

<span>Although spousal influence in the decision-making process has been investigated in the academic literature, most of the existing research has focused on decision-making for consumer goods. This paper reports the results of a cross-cultural study of consumer decision making for two broad types of services, across three different household samples (US Americans, Indian Tamil US Immigrants, and Indian Tamils living in India). Findings of the study suggest that for both types of services, there is more joint decision making within American US households than in Indian-Tamil households. Joint decision making is least prevalent in Tamil households in India.</span>


2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 353-368 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marta Giner Torréns ◽  
Joscha Kärtner

This cross-cultural study examines, first, whether 18-month-olds’ helping behavior differs between cultures and, second, the way in which caregivers’ socialization goals and practices are associated with toddlers’ helping behavior. Helping behavior was assessed in three out-of-reach tasks with increasing motivational demands. We found that Delhi toddlers ( n = 32) helped more than Münster toddlers ( n = 60). Regarding socialization practices (SPs), Delhi mothers, compared with Münster mothers, reported to provide more opportunities to help in the family context and to praise less when fostering toddlers’ prosocial behavior. Furthermore, Delhi mothers reported to use more punitive practices after their children did not follow a helping request. On an intra-cultural level, we found that helping was positively associated with punitive practices in the Delhi sample, whereas helping was negatively related with punitive practices and providing opportunities to help in Münster. On the basis of these results, we first propose that culture affects toddlers’ helping behavior from the time of emergence during the second year. Second, we propose that the culture-specific conceptions of prosocial behavior influence which SPs parents use, which, in turn, may influence children’s motivation underlying early prosocial behavior.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document